Govt 'creatively accounting' for rebuild

Last updated 08:30 11/08/2014

Relevant offers

The Rebuild

Organ music heard again at Knox Church Desperate woman in EQC limbo Scirt go dancing in the streets $50m complex at McKenzie and Willis site Commissioner Rennie apologises for Sutton press conference Church 'taking time to reflect' EQC slated after asbestos inquiry Asbestos risk 'very low' in quake repairs: Worksafe Christchurch stadium build pushed back to 2025 High-end apartments ready to take shape

NZ First leader Winston Peters has accused the Government of deceit on the cost of the Christchurch rebuild and on foreign land ownership.

The Government was applying "creative accounting" for the city's rebuild estimates and costs in order to claim the small surplus in the last Budget, Peters told a Grey Power meeting in Rangiora last week.

Prime Minister John Key was saying another $5 billion was required in future years while at the same time the Government was shaving $500 million from the rebuild, Peters said.

He said that when questioned at the finance and expenditure select committee, Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee "finally conceded the two positions . . . could not be reconciled".

In a transcript of the meeting, Brownlee agreed the budgeted costs for all earthquake matters was down by half a billion but did not say it created a cost-saving that led to the Government's 2014/15 Budget surplus.

A big part of the cost was horizontal infrastructure, which was initially estimated at about $3.4b, he said. The estimated cost for all Canterbury earthquake costs was revised to $3b, Brownlee said.

"In the end, we don't want to be saying to the contractors that this is a $3.5b job when it may not be," he said.

Peters also said the Government was not keeping records of land and house sales to foreign buyers.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content