Convention centre might be white elephant

Last updated 10:51 25/10/2014
Christchurch convention centre

ARTIST'S IMPRESSION: Christchurch town planners have been urged not to place too much emphasis on expensive, outdated projects like this proposed convention centre.

Relevant offers

The Rebuild

'Visible signs' of issues in Linwood Village, residents want to see redevelopment International hotel group buys Cathedral Square site for new hotel Johnny Moore: Going White Elephant hunting in Christchurch Christ Church Cathedral survey 'misleading', says restoration campaigner Call to make room for small businesses to return to central Christchurch Gerry Brownlee and Lianne Dalziel air concerns over Regenerate Christchurch's work plan First east frame homes to be completed five months ahead of schedule Earthquake tests on cheap, safe multi-storey building 'promising' Work starts on Christchurch red zone walk-run-bike trail Christchurch City Council faces ratepayer blowback on pedestrian-friendly city and loss-making pools

Doubts over the location and economic viability of Christchurch's convention centre could result in the project being a "huge disaster", a designer says.

Christchurch Central Development Unit (CCDU) director Warwick Isaacs is confident the key anchor project will ignite activity in the city's core and produce huge economic benefits, but urban designer James Lunday believes the centre's central-city location is wrong.

The convention centre precinct will be developed between Worcester and Armagh streets adjacent to the river - a location Lunday fears will block locals and tourists out of two prime city blocks.

The Crown has set aside $284 million for the development of the project and earlier this year the CCDU announced that Carter Group, Ngai Tahu Property and Plenary were the preferred developers.

It will not say what the ownership model of the partnership will be or which areas of the convention centre will be publicly accessible.

The convention centre would end up being a "decorated box", Lunday said.

"They talk about having active edges so it doesn't feel like dead space but that's just urban design-speak for tarting up something that doesn't work very well."

Conference facilities were not naturally lively places and locals and tourists would not be drawn to it, he said.

"The location is one of the most prime sites in the city. It will house conference delegates who eat their morning tea and lunch inside and then go back to their hotel afterwards.

"During the weekend, when there's no conference on, it will be dead."

CCDU director Warwick Isaacs said the $284m included the design, construction and delivery of the centre as well as the purchase of land for the whole precinct.

The location encouraged activity in "the heart of our city".

"The precinct is about much more than a convention centre.

"We will see developments including hotels and food and beverage outlets and others taking advantage of this prime location."

He would not confirm who would own what and whether the Crown or its development partners would be liable for costs.

Christchurch designer and writer Barnaby Bennett said the CCDU was "making huge financial decisions without transparency".

There needed to be thorough public consultation, he said, and Cantabrians deserved to know who would be liable for costs if the project was a flop.

Antony Gough, who is developing The Terrace, said the convention centre was "absolutely critical" to the city's recovery.

The pre-quake facility was dead when no conventions were on, he said, but the new one would be permanently active because of supporting businesses.

Ad Feedback

- The Press


Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content