Building height restrictions planned

LOIS CAIRNS
Last updated 15:21 15/02/2013

Relevant offers

The Rebuild

Rebuild behind schedule - Labour MPs Gym back on its feet at Arts Centre Council urged to require better provision for residential parking Christchurch needs dog-friendly trails Second chances on chain gang Construction site injuries spike Interest strong in sports lake plan Mission on for rebuild companies Aussies find 'cold' start in rebuild tough Peters claims quake workers weren't paid

Building heights will be restricted to a maximum of four storeys under a raft of planning rule changes being considered for central Christchurch residential areas.

When the Government released its Christchurch Central Recovery Plan on July 30 last year it directed the city council to review its district plan as it applied to living zones in the central city by March 1.

That review is now largely complete and council staff are proposing changes to the planning rules.

Staff are recommending:

- Reducing the maximum building height for developments in the Avon Loop area to two storeys and to between three and four storeys in other residential areas of the central city

- Standardising the requirements for outdoor living space, road setbacks, recession planes and separation from boundaries across the central city's three living zones.

- Removing some of the 11 special amenity areas in the central city, where tighter planning rules have applied to retain the special character of those areas.

- Removing the residential site density rules.

The council's planning committee today accepted those recommendations, but they have still to be ratified by the full council. That is due to happen on February 28.

If the council approves the recommendations it will recommend that Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee undertakes more public consultation on the proposed changes before it amends the district plan.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is the mayor correct to put libraries, pools and community facilities ahead of the Town Hall?

Absolutely, they're far more important

I think funds should be split between those facilities and the town hall

No, the Town Hall should be rebuilt first

Just demolish the Town Hall completely instead of rebuilding

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content