Landslide in votes on Cathedral

Last updated 05:00 05/04/2013
Daniel Tobin

The Press hit the streets to see what the public make of the three proposed Cathedral rebuild designs.

Opinion poll

What option do you prefer?




None - I want something else

Vote Result

Relevant offers

The Rebuild

Development on the horizon on Selwyn St, but business owners have reservations Central Christchurch business group battles budget cut 'Visible signs' of issues in Linwood Village, residents want to see redevelopment International hotel group buys Cathedral Square site for new hotel Johnny Moore: Going White Elephant hunting in Christchurch Christ Church Cathedral survey 'misleading', says restoration campaigner Call to make room for small businesses to return to central Christchurch Gerry Brownlee and Lianne Dalziel air concerns over Regenerate Christchurch's work plan First east frame homes to be completed five months ahead of schedule Earthquake tests on cheap, safe multi-storey building 'promising'

The future of Christ Church Cathedral will not be decided by a "public vote" but the people's opinion could be "very persuasive" if one of the designs gets overwhelming support, Bishop Victoria Matthews says.

Three options for the cathedral were revealed in The Press yesterday, including full restoration, traditional - a reinterpretation of the neo-Gothic cathedral in modern materials, and a completely new modern building.

The designs were released as part of a call for public feedback before Anglican leaders decide the future of the cathedral next month.

The city appears divided over the options, with more than 10,000 voters in a Press online poll almost evenly split between the three options.

The contemporary design was edging ahead with about 38 per cent of the vote while the other two schemes are attracting slightly below 30 per cent each.

Matthews said last night the public consultation would not be the deciding factor.

"If it is overwhelming that would be very persuasive but not the deciding vote. We are not voting in a design but we are listening to what the public have to say."

She would not reveal her preferred option.

"I'm not prepared to comment on that. In terms of governance it would be poor leadership to comment on my preference at this stage," she said.

"Everyone who has been involved has a preference one way or the other, but at this point we have agreed we will not speak of any preference because we want to hear what the public thinks and listen very carefully to that."

Christchurch Mayor Bob Parker has backed the contemporary option.

"I love the idea of something new. I think it's about looking forward rather than looking back, and this design helps with that," he said.

Parker said the contemporary option being the cheapest and quickest was simply a bonus.

"There's another reason why the contemporary vision starts to make a lot more sense, on the basis of costs and time alone," he said.

"It's time to move on and this building can actually play a role in helping us move on."

The co-chairman of the Great Christchurch Buildings Trust, Philip Burdon, called the cost of the designs "utterly absurd".

"The reality is that [the designs] are self-serving and distorted." Burdon and the trust had been fighting the demolition of the cathedral and supported the restoration of the historic building.

The restoration would cost between $104 million and $221m, the Gothic building with modern materials would cost between $85 and $181m, while the modern building would cost between $56m and $74m.


Campaigners hoping to restore Christ Church Cathedral have been given a boost by a cautious government signal that make-safe plans could work.

The Great Christchurch Buildings Trust, which has been campaigning to restore the cathedral, has worked up a plan to make the building safe without any demolition.

The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (Cera) initially said the plan could not be safely executed but now feels many safety concerns have been addressed.

Ad Feedback

Cera has sent a letter to Anglican leaders stating the scheme has gone "some way to mitigating safety concerns".

Trust co-chairman Jim Anderton was pleased with the letter.

"A year ago we were being told the cathedral was dangerous and had to come down immediately, there was no way it could be made safe," he said.

"Now we have some understanding that the cathedral is not a ruin and can be made safe."

- The Press


Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content