Sell non-core assets, Tim Carter says

FRANCESCA LEE AND NICOLE PRYOR
Last updated 05:00 22/05/2013
Tim Carter
Fairfax NZ
TIM CARTER: The Christchurch City councillor says the city could sell non-core assets, including its own offices, to help pay for big-ticket rebuild projects.
Opinion poll

Should the city council sell off some assets to pay for the rebuild?

Yes

Only the non-core assets

No

Vote Result

Relevant offers

The Rebuild

Rebuild tools stolen, repainted, resold Christchurch's rebuild begins with massive $4 billion construction spend John Key says shoddy quake repairs should be fixed High paid EQC staff 'fail' their customers Sheds rescued for art project Sir John Hansen is a man with a plan New Canterbury homes failing building surveys Christchurch faces 30 more years of rough roads Dyers Pass Rd partially one-way for up to six months The future of housing is here

A Christchurch City councillor says the city could offload non-core assets, including its own offices, to help pay its share of big-ticket rebuild projects.

Cr Tim Carter said last night that less important assets were expendable if sales helped ease the council's debt burden in funding anchor projects such as a new convention centre and a roofed sports stadium.

"We should question whether we should be owning half of the civic office building and the Henderson properties,'' he said.

"The Henderson properties ... add nothing to ratepayers. The council had no plan for how we were going to develop them when the council decided to purchase, and we still have no plan."

The council's projected debt from earthquake recovery of $2.1 billion was not sustainable, he said.

"The council's finances are in a very precarious position and we should consider our options rather than passing on higher rates," Carter said.

He was against selling strategic, money-earning assets such as Christchurch Airport, Lyttelton Port, Orion and Enable, which is installing ultrafast broadband in Christchurch.

His comments came as Prime Minister John Key yesterday weighed into the council asset sales debate.

Key told Firstline it was up to the council to ask whether the people of Christchurch wanted "the nice-to-haves".

"Then they'll ask how are you going to pay? That could be through rates or asset sales," he said.

The Government raised the estimates of the rebuild from $30b to $40b last month, with the Government's contribution increasing by $2b to $15b.

Christchurch Mayor Bob Parker said the council would not sell assets to fund its share of the city's quake repairs and rebuild.

Rates rises of between 5 and 6 per cent have instead been proposed.

Labour earthquake recovery spokeswoman and potential Christchurch mayoral candidate Lianne Dalziel said she opposed asset sales.

"I don't believe Christchurch should, in any way, sell revenue-generating strategic assets to pay for these anchor projects that the Government has decided we should build in our city,'' she said.

"The majority of these assets are assets that keep rates down."

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content