Key confirms GST increase being considered

BY MARTIN KAY
Last updated 14:31 09/02/2010

Prime Minister John Key addresses Parliament on plans for tax.

Related Links

PM John Key statement Key announces benefit crackdown Government signals education sector reform Colin Espiner blog: A pass for Key but much more to do

Relevant offers

The Government is considering increasing GST to as high as 15 percent as part of planned changes to the tax system, Prime Minister John Key has confirmed.

In a statement to Parliament, Mr Key said a ''modest increase'' in GST - presently 12.5 per cent - ''to no more than 15 per cent'' was being investigated, but more work would be done before any decisions were made.

Any increase would have to be accompanied by across-the-board reductions in personal tax rates and ''upfront increases'' in benefits, pensions and Working For Families payments to compensate for higher prices, posing a difficult balancing act.

''Suffice to say, the Government would not embark on a policy of increasing GST unless it would benefit the New Zealand economy in the long term and unless it saw the vast bulk of New Zealanders better off.''

Mr Key said the total tax changes being considered amounted to a $3 billion to $4 billion package.

It is the first time Mr Key has confirmed the Government is actively considering an increase in GST, a central recommendation of the tax working group set up to find ways to rebalance the tax system.

He left open the question of whether any change to GST - along with lower personal rates - would be announced in the May Budget, but confirmed there would be changes to the way property is taxed.

However, he ruled out a land tax, a capital gains tax and a tax that would set a flat rate on the value of equity in investment properties.

He said a land tax would fall only on people who held their wealth in a particular form and would cause financial strife for those on low incomes. A capital gains tax would extend the tax net, but make the tax system ''more complex to adminitser and comply with'', while a flat tax on equity - known as the risk-free return method - would hit tenants with higher rents.

Mr Key did not specify what property tax changes would be in the Budget, but his statement was notable for not ruling out ending tax breaks available through depreciation.

The tax working group said that would give the Government an extra $1.6 billion a year.

Mr Key also left open the prospect of ending the ability of investors to write off losses on property against other income.

Increasing GST to 15 per cent would bring in an extra $1.9 billion, once automatic adjustments to benefits and superannuation payments are factored in.

Mr Key 's statement to Parliament - in which the prime minister maps out the Government's main priorities for the year ahead - focused heavily on efforts to rebuild the economy after the worst downturn since the Great Depression.

He said rebalancing the tax system was a major plank.

"We have a tax system that taxes labour and investment income at relatively high rates, taxes consumption at a relatively low rate, and generally gives money back to people when they invest in residential property.''

Other areas of focus included: improving public services; supporting research and development, innovation and trade; better regulation, including around the use of natural resources; infrastructure investment; and boosting education and skills.

Ad Feedback

He warned that the public sector faced a continued financial squeeze, with "most agencies" getting no additional funding for "several years".

They would be forced to reorganise their backroom functions to move services to the front line, making greater use of technology and sharing services with other agencies.

"We are keeping a tight lid on new spending over the foreseeable future, which will enable us to get the budget back into surplus and keep public debt under control."

Mr Key said changes would be made to the way crown research institutes were funded, but did not provide details. However, he said the CRIs could be 'more powerful engines of growth' and changes would include getting more of their research and knowledge into companies.

He also mapped out an extensive agenda in the area of free trade negotiations, with deals with Hong Kong and a collection of states in the Persian Gulf due to be signed this year. Negotiations with the United States, which wants a broad Asia-Pacific free trade zone based on the existing Trans-Pacific Partnership - which includes New Zealand - would be the most important focus, but proposed agreements with South Korea and India were also likely to progress.

Plans to increase work test measures for beneficiaries - a centrepiece National welfare policy at the last election - would also be significantly progressed, as would reforms to the education sector.

A proposal to allow mineral mining on Conservation Department land that is presently locked out was expected in the near future.

The Government would also pass tougher law and order provisions, including the 'three strikes' policy that would see violent criminals locked up for the maximum jail time for their third or subsequent offence.

- © Fairfax NZ News

14 comments
Post a comment
Jim   #14   07:13 am Apr 25 2010

How come we don't do a similar thing like the UK does with there VAT for our GST so that there is different rates (3 to be exact) depending on what it is IE no tax on food or books or childrens clothes, reduced rate for fuel and power etc and full for other stuff. I do not know if putting GST up is a great idea, I thought people spending $ was a good thing for an economy, not trying to curb spending. Some NZers spend beyond there means and get themselves into too much debt, this doesnt mean we should rip up GST to help stop them, we should invest in other means to show people overspending is bad. The UK dropped there VAT rate to try to help try stimulate there economy and here we are putting it up.

Kiwioverseas   #13   04:26 pm Mar 02 2010

There are some valid comments from both sides of society. However; everybody needs to look back a bit, look at the events that lead up to this moment. Why is the Govt having to increase taxes? It should have never come this far in the first place, and now... our families back home are suffering because of a incompetent decision. Unfortunately now; Mr Keys is right, it will be beneficial to NZ as a whole, but to the individual NZ family on minimum income; this could spell disaster. A pound of butter for $6, or a loaf of bread at $5. What's this country coming too? I love home and it's culture, but seriously... I count myself lucky to be living in a country where the minimum wages are $18.80 - not $12.75 per hour. The fact that the government gave a national increase is not a win at all and because of it, this is part of it's recovery plan along with business sold off shore. NZ is quickly running out of buying power, there is no solid foundation to sustain it's current economic position and I don't think NZ will really recover from this for a long time.... I predict 20 years, not 7 years. Also - I agree with other comments on this blog; listen first, understand what this is all about... before you comment, some of you have no idea... but you also need to look back 20 years or so ago when this all first started... Remember Rogernomics? This is the end result of that era...

Randy Jackson   #12   12:21 pm Feb 10 2010

C'mon dutchie lets get real - no 1 cares about holland! Where is that anyway? Down by invercargill somewhere? Thought so. Yippie Kiy Yayy Mother F*****!!! Wahooo!!

kiwibeca   #11   10:17 pm Feb 09 2010

Stealing from the poor to line the pockets of the wealthy - typical Centre-right bull crap. Roll on the 2011 election; lets get rid of these idiots.

lawz   #10   10:04 pm Feb 09 2010

Look at the whole package instead of bits and pieces that suit or doesn't suit us as individuals. This could boost long term savings and investments as people resist consumerism. Overall better for the country financial health in the long term

Chris   #9   09:42 pm Feb 09 2010

To numbers 1,2 and 3. Try listening to JK's speech or at least ride the statement.

I think he explained very well why it needs to be done and why this way is the best way.

No point in moaning about Rich Richer talk - he explained why that would not be the case.

The sooner we learn that how we live now is unsustainble in an economic environment the better. GST increases will show us that.

Dan The Man   #8   08:36 pm Feb 09 2010

Hi Sir/Madam,

Firstly, I would like to say few words here.

We have to think about our LOW Income peoples around New Zealand.

not only just increase the GST to 15% this is not fare to every one.

John Keys is multi Million people and he can say what ever he can.

I personal sure next election John Keys will not be out NZ next PM.

Trust my WORDS... God beleave me not you..

NIc   #7   08:09 pm Feb 09 2010

You idiots should listen to the whole speech. Focus on one part and miss the real message. Mr Key is looking to re-adjust the imbalance of the WHOLE tax system. Income tax will be reduced if GST rises. I suggest you listen again and then react objectively

dutchie   #6   07:34 pm Feb 09 2010

@ Randy Jackson: whahahaha never been to Europe before haven't you? NZ the highest tax rate in the developed world?? Come to Holland and judge again!

Jon   #5   05:12 pm Feb 09 2010

I feel most sorry for low income earners, who rather than helping, the National Party is punishing them to the ground...I knew our country would deteriorate the moment John Key won that election...DAMN NATIONAL!!!


Show 1-4 of 14 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you cycle in Christchurch?

Yes

No

Occasionally

Vote Result

Related story: Cyclist's plea for changes after nearly losing leg

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content