Report against harsher knife penalties

BY COLIN ESPINER
Last updated 12:32 11/03/2010

Related Links

Use of knife to slay taxi driver part of a trend

Relevant offers

A Ministry of Justice report has recommended against increasing penalties for the possession of knives in public.

Justice Minister Simon Power ordered the report after a spate of knife crimes were reported in the media, and concerns voiced by Principal Youth Court Judge Andrew Becroft about young people carrying knives in public.

In Canterbury, charges for knife possession in a public place have increased by 85 percent since 2001, according to police statistics. Yesterday Shannon David Boyes-Warren, 17, was sentenced to life in prison with a 15 and a half-year non-parole period for the knife killing of Afghan immigrant Abdulrahman Ikhtiari.

But a report just issued by the ministry says that overall, police arrests for possession of a knife in a public place has remained relatively stable over the past decade.

There were 916 police apprehensions in 1999, rising to a peak of 1175 in 2006 before falling to 995 in 2008. Taking into account increases in the population, the rate actually declined.

However, the apprehension rate for the more serious offence of possession of an offensive weapon has increased, from 955 in 1999 to 1499 in 2008. Only 20 percent of these offences involved knives.

The current penalties for knife possession without reasonable excuse are three months’ jail or a fine of $2000, although offenders can also be charged under the more serious offensive weapon section of the Crimes Act, which provides a jail term of up to two years.

Officials said they believed the current penalties for possession of a knife were adequate. But they said consideration could be given to increasing the penalty for possession of an offensive weapon from two to three years’ jail.

 That would bring the offence into line with the three years’ jail provision for possession of burglary tools.

 

“Given the increase in apprehensions and prosecutions for the Crimes Act offence of possession of an offensive weapon we could investigate an increase in the penalty for this offence.’’

The report said such a move would be likely to increase the prison population and the number of offenders on home detention and community sentences, and this would require further work from the Corrections Department.

It also suggests using schools and the Government’s Fresh Start programmes to educate young people on the dangers of carrying knives, and developing a voluntary accord, involving retailers, local authorities and police, to limit the sale of knives to young people.

Ad Feedback

In Britain the government recently took a more hardline approach, increasing the penalty for knife possession from two years to four years’ jail, and raised the age at which a knife could be purchased to 18. It also gave police new powers to stop and search people suspected of carrying knives.

Mr Power said he was considering all options in the ministry’s report, with the aim of sending a clear signal that carrying knives was not acceptable.

 “It’s timely we have a debate on knife possession to ensure knife crime does not escalate. I’m very keen to hear what the public thinks about these options and will be monitoring the debate closely,” Mr Power said.

HAVE YOUR SAY: Comment on this story below.

- © Fairfax NZ News

4 comments
Post a comment
Nightwing   #4   08:21 pm Mar 11 2010

I'm all in favour of enforcing the law but once again we see a knee jerk reaction without much thought. Britain has some of the stiffest legislation in the world in relation to knives and firearms. Has it solved the problem or changed the street culture, has it bollocks. Knifings and shootings in the UK are in epidemic proportion. The answer is to deal with the wider issues of crime and lawlessness that lead to people feeling the need to carry a weapon. I carry a knife when I go fishing, hunting or into the bush. It is a mandatory piece of field and survival equipment and I see nothing wrong with the practise. Are you going to arrest me and send me to prison for three years ? Absolute rubbish. And yes robbie #2, life should be life, not a poultry 15 years minimum. A life sentence should start with a minimum of 25 years or more.

How   #3   07:22 pm Mar 11 2010

Life in the"Good ole USA" is about seven years, but most serve only half that with time off for good behavior. Of course a lot of jail terms are being shortened even more now that the economy is so bad. Prisons are setting people free because they can't afford to keep them.I think if things continue like this in a few more years from now crime will pay.

robbie   #2   03:49 pm Mar 11 2010

yep,and life should be life as it is in the good ole USA

Ed   #1   02:18 pm Mar 11 2010

death penalty by knife would be appropriate.

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you cycle in Christchurch?

Yes

No

Occasionally

Vote Result

Related story: Cyclist's plea for changes after nearly losing leg

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content