Push to tag booze with health alert

REBECCA TODD
Last updated 05:00 31/01/2011

Relevant offers

A warning that alcohol is bad for you will appear on glitzy liquor and wine labels if proposals for trans-Tasman food labelling laws are adopted.

An alcohol warning is one of many proposals made by an independent panel, commissioned by the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council.

The panel also recommends fast-food outlets highlight the calorie counts of their burgers, chips and other foods.

In a newly released report, Labelling Logic, the panel has recommended that generic warnings such as "Alcohol can damage your health" be mandatory on all alcohol. Warnings about the danger of drinking while pregnant would be on individual containers and at the point of sale. Alcoholic drinks would also have to have the calorie content of the drink on their labels.

The labels would be part of a "comprehensive multifaceted national campaign targeting the public health problems of alcohol in society", the report said.

New Zealand has a joint food standards code with Australia so any changes would have to be agreed by both countries.

In response to the report, brewer Lion Nathan promised to "voluntarily adopt consumer health messages that support responsible drinking choices, including during pregnancy".

National Addiction Centre director Doug Sellman welcomed Lion Nathan's decision and the recommendations.

Evidence showed health warnings on alcohol affected people's choices, he said. They were needed to counteract the "misleading and deceptive messages" the liquor industry put out through advertising.

He feared the recommendations could be ignored by the Government, just as it had failed to act on key recommendations in the Law Commission's alcohol review.

The Australasian expert panel, which visited Christchurch last March, recommended the nutritional value of fast food be displayed on menu boards and advocated a voluntary traffic-light labelling system for food.

Green would identify food as healthy, amber as less healthy and red the least healthy.

Although voluntary at first, the system would be mandatory where health claims were made.

Canterbury Community and Public Health nutritionist Janne Pasco said people would be "astounded" to see the calorie content of fast food.

Britain had adopted the traffic-light system and had seen a marked increase in sales of healthier products and a decrease in sales of the less healthy.

"I really believe it's probably the only way that people can make an informed and healthy choice," she said.

New Zealand Food and Grocery Council chief executive Katherine Rich said she was disappointed by some of the recommendations in the report which were "impractical, costly and evidence-light".

Ad Feedback

Green Party MP Sue Kedgley said the Government needed to urgently implement the recommendations.

- © Fairfax NZ News

25 comments
Post a comment
Kiwi with an argument.   #25   10:59 am Feb 01 2011

Nanny state. Nanny state nanny state. I also think that nanny state. Nanny state. PC gone mad. Nanny state. Tall poppy syndrome.

Tim   #24   09:41 am Feb 01 2011

@Dan B. Open your eyes. This is a yet another step down a dangerous road.

SpaceMonkey   #23   09:28 am Feb 01 2011

This is not about health and wellbeing of the individual. If we were serious about that, alcohol would be illegal and a class A drug. The proposal to label alcohol is about culpability and ultimately about money. Labelling means the purchaser cannot claim ignorance of any health issues associated with alcohol and therefore all the responsibility lies with the purchaser. It protects the alcohol industry from the kind of law suits we've seen in the cigarette industry. Mobile phones will be next...!

seth   #22   09:18 am Feb 01 2011

@DLC, sorry, thats a weak argument. Because alcohol is bad for pregnant women then it means we need to have all bottles adorned with warnings and pictures of rotting livers?

Pregnant women get advised by their doctors and midwives as soon as they are pregnant what they should and shouldn't be putting in their bodies - having a label on a bottle will make 0% impact to pregnant women.

Forbsie   #21   09:15 am Feb 01 2011

More inane legislation that is ineffective, and will simply result in an increase in costs, which will no doubt be passed on to and accepted by long suffering consumers!

phig   #20   08:46 am Feb 01 2011

#5 i'm with you enough destroying our bodies with Alcohol legalize cannabis, save millions wasted in police resource fighting it and make some money for the country by producing it and putting a tax on. Far safer than Alcohol

Dan B   #19   08:35 am Feb 01 2011

Tim #14

I don't think its nanny state at all. You still have the choice about whether to use alcohol or not, don't you? The labels are just putting the information out there so people can make a better informed choice.

Sniffles   #18   08:21 am Feb 01 2011

Dave #7 A few hundred years ago it was much safer to drink ale than the dihydrogen monoxide which was on offer, even little kids drank beer, ale and wine. Drinking that dirty dihydrogen monoxide stuff kills millions of people every year.

Still, I don't suppose putting health warnings on booze is going to hurt anyone and it sort of chips away at your subconscious that alcohol is not a particularly healthy food choice.

Unbelievable   #17   08:04 am Feb 01 2011

Oh my gosh what an absolute bunch of whingers in this country. If it is not going to change the way you currently act as mentioned by quite a few here then why complain about it. Sheesh some people really need to chill out and get a life. At the end of the day you either heed the warning or you don't. It is your decision in the end what you choose to consume and in what quantities.

Clare   #16   08:18 pm Jan 31 2011

The ones who will take notice of this are the ones who probably don't drink often anyway.

I can't see this working at all..


Show 1-15 of 25 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you cycle in Christchurch?

Yes

No

Occasionally

Vote Result

Related story: Cyclist's plea for changes after nearly losing leg

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content