Speed-camera tickets nearly double

Last updated 09:59 15/09/2011
Opinion poll

What does a doubling in speed camera ticket numbers show?

People aren't getting the message about speeding

If you speed you're going to get ticketed

Holiday weekend lowered tolerance is just revenue gathering

Police target average drivers, not just dangerous speeders

Vote Result

Relevant offers

The Automobile Association is calling for road signs to alert drivers of speed cameras after the number of tickets issued nearly doubled last year compared with the year before.

There were nearly 627,000 infringements in 2010, almost twice as many as the previous year, and more than 200,000 above the four-year average to 2009, Radio New Zealand reported.

The country's 55 speed cameras issued 200,000 tickets in the first four months of this year.

Superintendent Paula Rose, the national road policing manager, told Radio New Zealand the increase was due to the introduction of digital cameras, better deployment of resources and reducing speed tolerance during holiday periods.

She said the cameras were there for road safety and not to generate revenue.

But AA motoring affairs general manager Mike Noon said the public were concerned the cameras were for revenue gathering, rather than safety.

He said that instead of having the speed cameras hidden, there should be signs in place to alert motorists.

"We think that will cause motorists to slow down more in those areas. If they do that, then [police] will achieve their job of making that area safer.''

Noon said 93 per cent of members wanted revenues from new fines to be spent on road safety, rather than going to the Government's general account.

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

22 comments
Post a comment
Our road toll must come down   #22   05:12 pm Sep 17 2011

I have worked as a professional driver, rode motorcycles on and off for 20 years and work in the transport industry.

It’s time for New Zealand drivers and riders to wake up.

We kill around four hundred people every year on our roads.

Since Jan 1 this year, we have killed 127 people.

We maimed (‘injured’ is too polite a term) almost 14 000 of our fellow Kiwis in the 12 months to the end of August this year.

This is equivalent to every person in Fielding, Te Awamutu or Mosgeil being hit with up to forty tonnes of moving metal, and the rest of us dealing with the resulting mess.

In my travels, I have watched: - a driver of a 4WD do a u turn across three lanes of motorway-traffic - a motorcyclist die after smashing headfirst into a motorway barrier after misjudging a corner while riding their bike under the influence of alcohol - a driver fall asleep and crash their van containing 9 passengers - a driver, fleeing Police at high speed, roll their car down a three lane highway, luckily not crashing into anyone else.

I’m all for speed cameras, hidden or hidden in plain sight, as one tool to try and bring our terrible road toll down. Who cares where the money goes? Don’t exceed the limit and you won’t get a ticket. It’s a no-brainer, really.

Speed is one factor contributing to road deaths. We need competent drivers and riders, with safe vehicles and motorbikes, keeping within their ability and riding/driving to the conditions on roads designed for safety/survivability.

How about we all try this?

For one day, just one day, no-one exceed the posted speed limit anywhere in NZ. For you complaining about the revenue grab, there would be none. For you who then crash, at least speed wouldn'

robert   #21   09:22 am Sep 16 2011

This is blatent revenue gathering. There seems to be little interest in road safety and positioning speed cameras at the bottom of a dip is stupid. We want people to have their eyes on the road rather than continously looking at the speedo and missing road hazards. To fine the guy who flashed is lights is a joke. Having nearly be the victim of a single car accident caused by trucks incorrectly using fog and driving lights certainly reinforces the fact of NOT policing for road safety. 2 lights = dipped lights so having a truck coming with 6 lights is what - dipped lights, fog lights and another set. He ran me off the road.

Alex   #20   06:08 pm Sep 15 2011

That is interesting that the money goes into a general account instead of going into road safety programes. Why?(that in my books is revenue gathering a bad behavour tax if you will) Is this money audited? Where does it go? Is there anywhere that I can find this out? I think a lack of transparency with what happens to this money is the main reason for people believing that this is revenue gathering.

Ellie   #19   04:38 pm Sep 15 2011

All those who dislike having this revenue generated off them should *gasp* try not speeding. I stick to the speed limit and, guess what, I've never had a ticket in my life. If you genuinely think this is just to grab your money, the surest way to annoy the people who are 'out to get you' by this exercise is to not give them an excuse to take your money. Simple and safe. Win-win!

jim   #18   02:29 pm Sep 15 2011

reported yesterday was speed only causing 13% of injuries in 4 years in Canterbury. That puts speed cameras and the police into the revenue collecting basket, now if they started focusing on the urban intersections which caused 51% injury, then they would be doing their job properly! ref http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/5611665/Most-injury-crashes-in-at-intersections

JW   #17   11:50 am Sep 15 2011

What on earth?? signs to warn drivers of cameras, who are already speeding and putting not just themselves but also others at risk?? is AA gone crazy?? There is no need to speed anyway... these roads are only made for 100 km/h and not more!!

Bud   #16   11:29 am Sep 15 2011

Speedometers are typically off by 5% and commonly off by 10-15% (usually saying the car is going faster). It is therefore completely unreasonable to tax drivers with speeding tickets for speeds as low as 3% over the posted limit. Safety is a matter of paying attention to the road, not staring at the speedometer in fear.

chris   #15   11:26 am Sep 15 2011

How many of those complaining about speed cameras speed? I see people constantly speeding here in Christchurch (Moorhouse Ave, Brougham Street, Ferry Road etc) and have no sympathy for them if they get caught.

There's a really easy fix to this: Don't speed. It's quite simple really. Also, be aware of your surroundings and take note of the signage. If you can't do that you shouldn't be driving.

Tui   #14   11:23 am Sep 15 2011

Speed cameras "not for revenue gathering" - Yeah Right!

Pete   #13   11:22 am Sep 15 2011

When approaching a change of speed sign you should be decelerating before getting to the sign, not after. If you think it's a revenue collecting scheme, deprive the tax payer by sticking to the posted speed limit. If, like me, you think it's safe to drive at the posted limit then you'll be immune from the fine too.


Show 1-12 of 22 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you cycle in Christchurch?

Yes

No

Occasionally

Vote Result

Related story: Cyclist's plea for changes after nearly losing leg

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content