Council backs study for light rail
SAM SACHDEVA
Relevant offers
A proposed light rail network for Christchurch has taken a step closer to reality, but its first route is still to be decided.
At yesterday's draft central city plan deliberations, councillors voted to support $4million of funding for a feasibility study into the proposed network and budget another $406m to build the first stage.
However, the council backtracked on the draft plan's proposal to confirm a link to Canterbury University as the first stage of the network.
Instead, they resolved to choose the first section after the study identified a link that was "best able to support economic and business recovery" in the city.
Councillors were unanimous on providing funding for the investigative study, but divided on whether they should allocate money for the first stage of the project.
Cr Yani Johanson expressed concerns about the lack of analysis that had been presented to councillors before they were asked to make a decision.
"We are being asked to spend $4m for a light rail investigation, but we don't have any information around the possible harms and possible benefits of any network."
Cr Sally Buck said the council needed to look at successful and unsuccessful light rail systems in other cities and determine the goals of a Christchurch system before it allocated any funding.
"We should commit to a good public transport system for Christchurch, but you don't say you're going to put the money in without doing due diligence."
Cr Claudia Reid said the council could not afford to let the opportunity pass.
"We are pioneers for the people who will live here in the next 50 to 100 years, and it would be unbelievable if we didn't take this opportunity seriously."
Cr Jamie Gough said it would be "utterly irresponsible" for the council to commission a study without putting aside funding for the first stage of a network.
"We've got to put our money where our mouth is."
Mayor Bob Parker said the light rail network was one of the "strong aspirational ideas" which the Government had asked the council to include in the plan.
"This [plan] needs to provide a basis for the city to go into the future, not just to put it back the way it was."
Parker said the council's decision did not mean it was committed to constructing the network.
Councillors voted six to four to allocate funding for the first stage of the network, with Johanson, Buck, Jimmy Chen and Glenn Livingstone voting against.
The university will still have a special connection to the central city, after councillors voted to establish a cycle lane connecting the two areas.
Cr Reid said the council needed to ensure the university was well connected with the CBD. "We need to stimulate the connection between that part of the city and the central city, because that will be one of the drivers of new life and energy in the central city."
Councillors also resolved to support the protection of possible transport corridors in the city for future use.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Brooke your a legend, Unfortunately the Council believes it is has superior minds to the rest of us. Sometimes you need to swear and shout to get attention. CP#58 if you do not live here or understand what is going on %*%4##r off!
You have to Laugh at Nelly's "Or failed Business Operators" Lets look at the CCC, In particular V-Base, if it weren't for council raiding the ratepayers pockets this would be an EPIC Failure, Lets also look at other Council business transactions, Henderson Properties under insured and no one has yet answered how this sat in terms of the loan requirements for insurance to cover the debt, Wait.... once again the CCC will simply take this out of the ratepayers pockets. If the CCC were in fact a business there would have been mass sackings and a clearing of the board a looooooooong time ago.
To #35 $4M in depth? you must be joking, go read the initial paper it proposed a $2M study for the rest of the network after the initial link was in, this was $2M on a circa $2b network, so how on earth this bunch of bungling bureaucrats came up with $4M for a study on a $400M initial project beggers belief, and then they don't even know where they want to put it.
One thing that has been proven around the world is light rail does not stimulate development, incentives to developers stimulate development. Simply look at the Portland fiasco, and if certain individuals get their way we will be destined to repeat the failings of others.
I am disappointed that this feasibility study is limited to light rail. For $4 million I would expect the study to not only study and contrast the feasibility of a train-tram system but also a heavy rail system and a bus rapid transit system.
However I am even more disappointed that Christchurch has bred such arrogant people such as Brooke McKenzie and the likes, who resort to ad hominem attacks in order to push their agenda on this matter.
@#55. the content of your response is a textbook example of democracy at work. Judging by your tone I think the sensible voters of ChCh made very clear choices about who they wanted to govern their city. Your response proves they also luckily made the right choice in your ward
Brooke McKenzie #55 Bitter much? I don't know you, nor do I live in Christchurch. I have to say that I would not consider voting for someone with such poor communication skills as yourself. If you need to swear to bring your point across, you need help.
How's the wine Nelly?
@ Brooke McKenzie #55, I applaud you!
Mr McKenzie, you will find and I am sure you will be well aware, included in the 4 mil will be some overseas jaunts for the few to get the facts needed. Utter BS! You know and I know - those morons or some of them, just want another trip.
Nelly all the people you criticise are a damned site more succesful in life than you, even though your vicious little bum sits on the council or alternatively married to the narcistic megalomaniac. Yes l stood for council because of corruption and bailing out Henderson and paying 3 mill for a flower show name, behind closed door - non inclusive governance. Im just sorry it became less interest after an earthquake put my family first. It really is a pity we have the "lifes loser" council we do. Not one succesful person on it, unless turncoat gold spooners (with major CBD family interests)count as success. Quite frankly you lot couldn't run a warm bath let alone a city. So Nelly put YOUR name to your comments or &@$@ off and give your husband a hard time instead of continually abusing people who do have a few clues or at least considerably more than your ignorance shows. By the way l will publically take you lot on head to head on the facts of buses on tracks. Youre paying $4 million to learn something l can tell you for free. Real dumb $%@Q!&#'s arent you. The man who talks about Freiberg - get your facts right as its a lousy example for those espousing the merits of buses on tracks.
clint #15 "Now watch the whingers crawl out of their holes."
Prophetic! A few with vested interests in keeping their wealth at the expense of community are trying to hold this city to ransom. Thank god for the new city plan. We must see it become a reality.
A day for Christchurch to remember
One dead in overnight Oxford blaze
Coast mine allowed to resume work
Rebuild slower than thought - Fletchers
Beck officially sworn into council
Installation represents victims' personalities
Stadium beams 4cm short, rebuild delayed
Ferries cancelled after near-miss
Proud dad full of praise for son's heroic efforts
Birthday forgotten in grief over husband
Engineer denies 'conflict of interest'
Three charged over pharmacy robberies
Climber dies in Fiordland fall
Blenheim wife killer denied freedom
Flights into Dunedin Airport resume
Pupil's eye injured in water fight
On track with mum, just like she wanted
What it means to live in Christchurch
Families grieve in their own way
John Key recalls February 22, 2011
Global remembrance of the Christchurch quake
Do you cycle in Christchurch?
Newest First
Oldest First
I want to see the reseach proposal, including costings, for this 4 million dollar study.