Promise broken, says Forest & Bird

DAVID WILLIAMS
Last updated 05:00 30/11/2011

Relevant offers

The Government has broken a promise over mining on its first working day after the election, Forest & Bird says.

After last year's U-turn over mining on protected schedule 4 land, Conservation Minister Kate Wilkinson and Energy and Resources Minister Gerry Brownlee said significant applications to mine public land "should be publicly notified".

In the lead-up to Saturday's general election, Forest & Bird attempted in meetings and letters to get Wilkinson to commit to public consultation on Australian-owned coalminer Bathurst Resource's plans for an opencast mine on the West Coast's Denniston Plateau.

But in a letter sent on Monday – the first working day after Saturday's election – Wilkinson told Forest & Bird general manager Mike Britton that access for mining on conservation land was considered under the Crown Minerals Act, which did not provide for public consultation.

Therefore, public consultation would "not be appropriate", she said.

Forest & Bird conservation advocate Nicola Vallance described the letter as a "slap in the face" for her organisation and for people who wanted a say on the application.

"We consider it a huge breach of faith," she said.

"This is very clearly a broken promise."

Wilkinson's spokesman said the Government was "moving forward" on its July 2010 promise as part of a Crown Minerals Act review.

"That includes working out what constitutes a significant mining application."

The Government would not say when its review would be completed but expected "significant progress" to be made early next year.

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

14 comments
Post a comment
Lex Hawthorn   #14   01:45 pm Dec 01 2011

firstly it is an australian company. where will the majority of profits go do you think? safety will go as well. Australia is bloody near 1 great big mine site, and they are robbing all the mineral resources out of the ground contrary to OECD guidelines. follow the link and read it all especially the mining link. http://www.ethicalcorp.com/governance-regulation/what-business-should-know-about-oecd-guidelines

Mike Fallon   #13   11:23 am Dec 01 2011

Now tell me if I am wrong, but isn't this a democracy where the will of the majority rules? If that majority votes to elect a government that seeks to rebuild the wealth of NZ by allowing mining then so be it. The only way that F&B would have their way is if a minority ruled, and that is not called democracy. I want to see my kids grow up in a wealthy country with job prospects, not just receive handouts of birdseed.

Mary A.   #12   10:11 am Dec 01 2011

This is National's last term and boy will they do damage if we do not stop them. I agree - "and so it begins" Broken promises and not listening to the people and failing the people and environment. This mining issue should show everyone National's priorities. Broken promises and stupid Kiwis who voted him back in. Be ashamed all you Kiwis who did not get out and vote Labour. Most will be disappointed. Flog off our assets to satisfy short-term needs. IT IS INSANE THAT YOU ENDORSED A GOVT WHO WANTS TO SELL OUR ASSETS.

obelix   #11   09:37 am Dec 01 2011

Fantastic news. We can hopefully start mining and make some money for a change and forget about the green stuff. Mine and feed the people is more important for NZ than worrying about feeding the birds.

Amazed   #10   09:06 am Dec 01 2011

lol @ Prosper's "there is no money in feeding the birds". There's the right wing position in a nutshell. And our government is exactly that selfish and short-sighted. The longer we let these money-worshippers lead the world, the more we deserve the inevitable results.

Lynden   #9   04:21 am Dec 01 2011

The public was actually notified on the matter. It was publicised in 'The Westport News', 'Greymouth Star', 'The Press' and The westcoast regional councils website. It may well be those that have not heard of it, live outside the district. If you want a say with what goes on, perhaps you should keep up with the local news.

Bruce   #8   06:47 pm Nov 30 2011

Where are the jobs? Oh there they are, you mean there is a cost? Well who would have thought it? Maybe the reality is that we would never get anywhere in this country because there is always some reason not to do something from a vocal minority. It will be managed and it is pretty much out of sight. A desolate area and most folk have never been there. I have been there 5 times in the last 2 years and I did wonder why it was not mined then. It is a resource and NZ needs jobs and money. Decisions need to be made and it is nothing to do with transparency. Make the decisions, that's what a government is supposed to do and stop spending! This is not the time.

Peter   #7   06:14 pm Nov 30 2011

Go Kate, About time this PC lot got sent packing. Get ride of the RMA and all the business's and professional protestors who built a career out of it ...byebye. The country is poor , borderline third world at best. With no money to pay for decent infrastructure so its being sold , all the while we look at some of the highest concentration of minerals in the world while we starve....so sorry oh so sorry F and B but we dont care....

mel2   #6   02:53 pm Nov 30 2011

Ah, the old " non-notifiable-trick" ... happened to Templeton people a few years back , a huge turnout of residents voted in a show of hands against a "burnout" pad in the area.They were PROMISED, at the meeting, that they could put in submissions later and to leave their names and addresses. 2 months later they all got a letter from Council saying it was "non'notifiable' and no submissions were being taken. The Pad cost you ratepayers close to $80,000 plus the cost of a councillor ( Stonhill) travelling to Australia to look at one over there. Same old same old.

Prosper   #5   02:24 pm Nov 30 2011

Well they need to do something to raise some money and employment as there is no money in feeding the birds, good stuff get some wealth and start rebuilding New Zealand,


Show 1-4 of 14 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you cycle in Christchurch?

Yes

No

Occasionally

Vote Result

Related story: Cyclist's plea for changes after nearly losing leg

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content