Cash jobs costing New Zealand billions
Have you ever paid, or accepted, cash for a job?
Relevant offers
Cash trade jobs, crime, wages under the table and online trading are costing the Government more than $7 billion a year in lost tax.
According to new research by the international Tax Justice Network, that's equivalent to 44 per cent of the country's health budget.
It estimates a "shadow economy" worth more than $20b makes up 12.4 per cent of New Zealand's gross domestic product.
The total tax lost each year from people who either evade tax or move it to tax havens is $7.1b, just behind Bulgaria and just ahead of Azerbaijan.
The Inland Revenue Department said yesterday that, while it could not attempt to estimate the size of the shadow economy, it had collected $137 million from tax evasion and fraud work in the past year.
Tax evasion is generally defined as the criminal non-payment of tax, while tax avoidance refers to using legal means to reduce the amount of tax a person or company must pay.
IRD spokesman Tony Morris said the department was unable to give an estimate of the size of the hidden economy.
In recent years, the huge growth in online trading had led to some trying to dodge tax.
"Some traders carrying out significant business think they are invisible to us because they operate without a traditional store front.
"We are working with the online sites and have access to sales data to identify people who are carrying out business over the internet without paying any tax.
"We analyse millions of transactions," Morris said.
A Trade Me spokesman said the website was the most public marketplace in the country and deep footprints of information were left behind.
"Trade Me is a really dumb place to do anything illegal, including avoiding tax.
"Everyone can see what a member has bought and sold.
"We work with government agencies including IRD. Like everyone else in New Zealand, sections 16 and 17 of the Tax Administration Act mean we are obliged to pass on information."
PricewaterhouseCoopers tax partner Geof Nightingale said there was no doubt New Zealand had a large shadow economy.
"The most significant part of this shadow economy will be cash jobs for tradespeople.
"Every time a tradesman turns up at your house and says: 'Well, it's $1000 to paint that room but if you pay me cash it's $800,' that's the shadow economy.
"That's tax evasion happening.
"There's a common Kiwi acceptance for cash jobs."
The shadow economy also included people who had money invested offshore but did not declare the interest, and businesses paying wages under the table, Nightingale said.
"If we could tax that shadow economy, we would either have more roads or hospitals or get out of deficit faster. I think Inland Revenue is well aware of that and are working very hard to do that, with some success."
In July, IRD commissioner Bob Russell said that, since the February earthquake in Christchurch, there had been a rise in the hidden economy.
"We anecdotally hear there's quite a lot of cash business going on in Christchurch these days," he said.
"It's a seller's market in the construction trades and, if you decide you only want to work for cash, you have power to do so."
Revenue Minister Peter Dunne said the $20b estimate of the shadow economy was in the area he expected.
"There is a vast underground economy in New Zealand, always has been: mate's rates, cash jobs, jobs in kind, all of those sort of things which are very hard to track down.
"There will be some high-level corporate evasion – I'm not denying that for a moment.
"But I think, in the New Zealand context, it is more likely to be those ingrained sorts of things – the mate's rates, the 'do a mate a favour', which has been part of our informal system, forever really."
Tax evasion was difficult to stop, he said.
"We discover a loophole, we close it and you never get ahead really – the next loophole is discovered and you are closing that.
"That's just the way it is, right around the world."
Since last year's Budget, the Government has allocated additional funding of $119.3m to IRD over several years.
Morris said the department's efforts were paying off: "This funding has enabled us to increase audit activity around the hidden economy and property transactions, and already we are seeing dividends on that investment.
"At the end of March this year, our hidden economy and property transaction areas were showing a return on investment of $5.70 for every dollar invested."
Serious offending could result in a criminal prosecution.
"Conviction on tax evasion charges can result in a fine of up to $50,000 for each offence ... they can also result in jail terms of up to five years."
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Perhaps we should follow some other countries' example and introduce a system of income and asset declaration by politicians and civil servants.. that would be a good start to control the flow and usage of funds, also by initiating a tender system for works and services which is fair, open and transparent, to say the least. But 'commercial sensitivity' and other dubious reasons are used as a cover up. And if Chris #21 will also do some research on the current issues related to trust management he will soon realise that in addition to his 'good' family trusts there are lots of others.. Check the PMs 'blind' trusts for example. just do a google search and you will be more than surprised..
Every one of you who has said a family trusts purpose is to avoid tax, are incorrect. Please do some research or learn the facts before you go to print. I will not give you all a lesson on Tax 101, but if you insist on perpetuating myth and misconception, you're wasting your day ! :-)
For starters, the Govt should make it compulsory for any business to issue a receipt for goods or services where cash has been paid if the purchaser requests it. I paid cash on behalf of someone else when I took their pet to the vet - sorry don't give receipts. Was given $ to buy fish & chips today for housebound couple - sorry no receipts given.
lose family trusts - that's really avoiding paying tax - oh yes, most of the top government people hide their money in here - yet again pick on the tradesman not the white-collar crimianls
As far as Sam Morgan is concerned, if he is so adamant that it was unfair that gains such as his were untaxed, then why doesn't he volunteer to pay the Government a "fair" percentage of the gross amount he received from selling TradeMe? Of course, he never will.....
Labour made the mistake calling their proposed new tax a capital gains tax.. they should have called it a speculators tax..., valid also for certain short-term capital gains. Morgan did not pay tax on his $700 million deal with TradeMe. Even he himself calls it unfair. look at all the trusts where the money disappears, and you have a re-elected PM who doesnt even know what his blind trusts are doing? and where did all the 100s of millions disappear the good old finance companies were managing. Their directors, if/when charged guilty, dont have to repay the millions but sit in their comfy multi-million dollar homes (owned by their trusts) suffering home detention.. thank you National.
How about the inept nat govt bring in legislation that will tax profits going off shore by corporations and big buisness,$20-$40billion goes off-shore untaxed,this is where the economy is bleeding and not from paltry sums that some people may gain from their own enterprise,there is a bigger picture here and the media need to focus on the profits going off-shore and the question of why they are not taxed,leave the little guy alone.
I had to stifle a laugh when I saw this. I said to my wife, 'If I worked in NZ I would not ever use my EFTPOS machine'. The GST rate here in Oz is 10% which is reasonable. In my opinion it isn't worth evading. Once it goes above that though it is a different story.
GST was supposed to be a low level tax to catch services in the tax net. NZ are making the mistake of relying on it too heavily by raising it. The net result is it benefits people who are self employed or other businesses who are prepared to take a slight risk. It is also very unfair on people with fixed incomes such as pensions who are forced to pay more and who never get proper compensation for these rises.
The result too of all of this is that it undermines the authority of government as more people get tempted to take cash and in effect put themselves on the wrong side of the law. People have already lost respect for the government as evidenced by the practice being widely accepted.
The right thing to do would have been to reduce GST to 10%. The reduction would not be too severe either as more people would pay the GST willingly, boosting revenues.
What do you expect when Bill English (I asume he is still the minister of finance?) encourages minimising your tax obligations using family trusts, or whatever method your tax accountant can find to pay a little tax as possible. And he leads by example. Taxpayers pay for his rental of his family hope in Wellington, because it is owned by the English family trust, not Bill personally.
It is always so much easier to blame the poorest for being poor, than to make the wealthy (but morally and socially redundant) pay there fair share.
A day for Christchurch to remember
One dead in overnight Oxford blaze
Coast mine allowed to resume work
Rebuild slower than thought - Fletchers
Beck officially sworn into council
Installation represents victims' personalities
Stadium beams 4cm short, rebuild delayed
Ferries cancelled after near-miss
Proud dad full of praise for son's heroic efforts
Birthday forgotten in grief over husband
Engineer denies 'conflict of interest'
Three charged over pharmacy robberies
Climber dies in Fiordland fall
Blenheim wife killer denied freedom
Flights into Dunedin Airport resume
Pupil's eye injured in water fight
On track with mum, just like she wanted
What it means to live in Christchurch
Families grieve in their own way
John Key recalls February 22, 2011
Global remembrance of the Christchurch quake
Engineer denies 'conflict of interest'
If in doubt, get a second opinion
One dead in overnight Oxford blaze
Birthday forgotten in grief over husband
What it means to live in Christchurch
If in doubt, get a second opinion
Earthquake bells proposed as tribute
Police release earthquake audio
What it means to live in Christchurch
Do you cycle in Christchurch?
Newest First
Oldest First
Bryan #22.........the floor is yours, please display your knowledge about trusts, family or otherwise, that are set up to avoid tax. Im all ears. Or do you just want to display your qualifications to make statements, versus mine ? If you know about them so do IRD and they have no evasion effect. Evasion is illegal. Avoidance is not.