Cost of repairs may signal end of the line

MICHAEL WRIGHT
Last updated 05:00 10/01/2012
Science Alive
JOHN KIRK-ANDERSON/Fairfax NZ
COVERING THEIR TRACKS: Even if the old railway station were to be repaired, Science Alive! is concerned about the perception of the building's safety and would be quite happy to move elsewhere.

Relevant offers

A high repair bill might be the death knell for Christchurch's old railway station in Moorhouse Ave.

The 52-year-old building, with its distinctive clock tower, was badly damaged in the September 4, 2010 and February 22, 2011 earthquakes. It suffered more damage during the aftershocks over Christmas.

Neville Petrie, chief executive of Science Alive!, which owns part of the building, said engineering assessments had not been completed but the signs were not good.

"It's looking very much like the cost to repair ... is going to be in excess of what it costs for a rebuild."

He said Science Alive! had submitted engineering reports to its insurer for review, and a result was expected by early next month.

The clock tower was the most problematic part of the structure, Petrie said.

"It's reinforced concrete and steel [and] it's a lot more flexible than the bricks.

"With the weight of the clock tower and the force of the earthquake, it's flexed and it's damaged a lot of the walls through the rest of the building. There's been a large amount of damage which isn't obvious from the outside."

No decision had been made on demolition, Petrie said, but the company was unlikely to return to the old building if it survived.

"I couldn't imagine that Science Alive! would be re-establishing itself in the old railway station," he said.

"If it were to be repaired, we'd be concerned about the perception of the building [and] going back in there with a lot of the public coming in."

Building a base in an information technology hub planned for the corner of Tuam and Manchester streets was an appealing alternative, he said.

"We would be quite happy to move. When you look at the new modern buildings that are portraying science and technology to the public [overseas], a railway station doesn't really lend itself to thinking ahead," he said.

The company owns 6000 square metres of the building and Grand Ltd, which owns the side occupied by Hoyts Cinema, has 11,000sqm.

Grand director Lisa Abbott was unavailable for comment yesterday but has previously voiced her preference for a rebuild over repairs.

A structural engineer for the Historic Places Trust inspected the building before Christmas.

Trust spokesman Jamie Douglas said the engineer's report had not been received, but it would form part of a recommendation to the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority on what to do with the building.

Ad Feedback

The railway station has a category 2 heritage listing.

- © Fairfax NZ News

12 comments
Post a comment
morgan   #12   05:45 pm Jan 11 2012

"It's looking very much like the cost to repair ... is going to be in excess of what it costs for a rebuild."

I wonder if this re-build cost is for a building with the same character or the same floor space as both need to be taken into account. I would be very interested to hear the cost of building the same building again and comparing that to the repair cost

Oh man!   #11   08:46 am Jan 11 2012

NNNoooo!!!! I love this building, so many memories as both a railway station and then going to Science Alive, Hoyts and Time Out when I was growing up. Moorhouse Ave just wouldn't make sense without it! Gutted...

Weary   #10   08:19 am Jan 11 2012

Frankly this building gives me the absolute creeps every time I drive past... I say get rid of it ASAP!!!

Steve   #9   07:24 am Jan 11 2012

Why are rebuilds not done how it was done in Germany after the war? rebuild and have the fronts as what the building once looked to retain character?

I too feel the station should be used as it was.

Reuben   #8   via mobile 02:20 am Jan 11 2012

Couldn't agree more with comments above...lets bring trains back to the heart of the city. On to the train off the ferry straight into the middle of town. Light rail will bring people in a quick and efficient manner back to where it matters most. Screw the malls that have killed our city...lets bring the people back

KS   #7   02:05 am Jan 11 2012

Relocating the railway station to its rightful place would be fantastic. Let's repair it if this is a viable option and make it an extra special experience for visitors. The building, like many others that can and should be saved, is more than an icon in our City, it is a touchstone of life pre September 2010 and we will need these to navigate our way into the future. If you want to help save viable heritage buildings in Christchurch, search for 'Christchurch' on www.change.org and sign the petition.

Been Benuane   #6   12:30 am Jan 11 2012

I love this; "When you look at the new modern buildings that are portraying science and technology to the public [overseas], a railway station doesn't really lend itself to thinking ahead"

There really are some clueless, ignorant and narrow-minded oinks on the mainland aren't there? he's obviously never heard of bullet trains.

I agree mysay, have a CBD terminus and forget these daft tram-train ideas. The corner of Tuam and Mancheste street couldn't be more ideal.

puzzled   #5   05:41 pm Jan 10 2012

Why would you want to build a new railway station near what has now been mapped as a new fault line (Barbadoes St)?

Hear Hear   #4   04:43 pm Jan 10 2012

Agree with both these. Demolish the existing building and build a new purpose built one. As an ex accommodation provider we had lots of comments regarding the current train station. It is an embarrassment to the city. Also the bus depots for Intercity and other tourist bus services could be incorporated as their exisiting facilities (before Feb) also do not deserve a mention. No parking being a biggey. Time to think outside the square and rebuild a bigger brighter CHCH with outstanding services for travelling public and tourists. We need them back and with the new airport we need to keep inmproving on the image of all travel providers.

Keep the clock   #3   04:18 pm Jan 10 2012

It will be sad to see Science alive go, having had a lot of fun memories there myself as a child. But the idea of sharing a new and revitalised science alive with my children is fantastic. Although you might not need your earthquake simulator anymore.. And we definately need to improve our public transport for the future Christchurch, so take the chance as we have it. But Please, if nothing else, keep the clock that reads 4.36.


Show 1-2 of 12 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you cycle in Christchurch?

Yes

No

Occasionally

Vote Result

Related story: Cyclist's plea for changes after nearly losing leg

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content