Majority favour compo for Bain

Six out of 10 say Bain deserves compensation

ANDREA VANCE
Last updated 05:00 21/02/2013
LINGERING DOUBT: David Bain, now 40, was found guilty in 1995 of murdering his parents, brother and two sisters in Dunedin the year before. He was acquitted after a retrial in 2009.
LINGERING DOUBT: David Bain, now 40, was found guilty in 1995 of murdering his parents, brother and two sisters in Dunedin the year before. He was acquitted after a retrial in 2009.

Relevant offers

Six out of 10 Kiwis believe the Government should compensate David Bain for the 13 years he spent in jail - but fewer are sure about his innocence.

A Fairfax Media-Ipsos political poll shows most voters are firmly in Camp Bain, with 60 per cent agreeing he deserves a payout for wrongful conviction over the murder of five members of his family.

However, when asked if Bain was wrongfully imprisoned in the first place, those surveyed were less certain. Almost a third of the 1000 people polled weren't sure, and only 40 per cent were convinced it was unjust.

Of that 40 per cent, 91 per cent said the 40-year-old was entitled to recompense from the Government.

The divisive case has dominated headlines since Bain was found guilty in 1995 of murdering his parents, brother and two sisters in Dunedin the year before. He was acquitted after a retrial in 2009.

His bid for compensation is on hold, after his legal team asked for a judicial review of the way Justice Minister Judith Collins handled the controversial case.

In December she rejected a report by retired Canadian judge Ian Binnie, who concluded Bain was entitled to compensation.

Pollsters Ipsos say voters fall into four main camps: 36.2 per cent say he was wrongfully jailed and deserves compo; just under 22 per cent say he was not wrongfully imprisoned and deserves nothing; 10 per cent have mixed views about imprisonment and compensation; and 32.8 per cent are simply not sure.

Collins has faced accusations she politicised the claim - which she denies. The matter is complicated by the fact Bain isn't automatically entitled to a payout because his case falls outside Cabinet guidelines.

Only 40 people (or 4 per cent) made direct reference to Collins' recent decision, suggesting she has dodged political fallout. But those who did mention her actions were strongly critical of what they viewed as interference with judicial process. Only four respondents explicitly agreed with her stance.

Among the comments was: "It's an indictment to the judge and an insult on the system . . . he is entitled to compensation."

Another said: "The independent judge was brought in to basically decide the merits of the case . . . Somebody took [the Government's] ball so they wanted to stop playing."

And one commented: "I feel very strongly over the years . . . that young man has been dealt a very terrible hand by the Crown and the Government so he deserves everything he's going to go for."

Ad Feedback

One respondent said he "should get a lot of money" if "it can be proven he didn't do it".

However, another believed his case was not proven beyond doubt.

Belief that Bain should receive compensation is stronger among Opposition party supporters - the highest is among Maori Party voters (78 per cent).

National Party supporters were least likely to agree to a payout (53 per cent). And National and Conservative Party voters are more inclined to believe Bain was not wrongfully imprisoned.

Younger people are more likely to agree that Bain deserves compensation.

- The Press

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should park land be turned into carparking for Jellie Park?

Yes, Jellie Park desperately needs more car parks

No, trees and grass should not be turned into tarmac

Vote Result

Related story: Car park plan shows 'breathtaking arrogance'

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Then and Now