Lucille Scollay jailed for manslaughter

DAVID CLARKSON
Last updated 10:53 13/03/2014
Lucille Sarah Scollay

SIX YEARS IN PRISON: Lucille Scollay stabbed her sleeping husband in what she called "a moment of madness".

Guy Christian Scollay
STABBED TO DEATH: Guy Christian Scollay.

Relevant offers

Lucille Sarah Scollay has been jailed for six years for manslaughter for stabbing her husband to death in a "moment of madness" when their 20-year marriage reached breaking point.

She took the pronouncement of the jail term calmly in the High Court at Christchurch today, a month after a jury found her not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter in her three-day trial.

Forty-five-year-old Scollay had indicated at the start of the trial that she was willing to plead guilty to manslaughter of her husband, Guy Christian Scollay.

That led to a reduction of the sentence imposed by Justice Cameron Mander.

Justice Mander said the family could take pride in the bearing of the couple's son, 20-year-old Louis Scollay, who had conducted himself with dignity and maturity throughout the proceedings.

The judge told Scollay: "Despite your actions, he has forgiven you."

The trial had heard of a life of depression and misery for the couple and that Scollay had been out socialising and was very upset about her situation when she returned to the house in the early hours of February 10, 2013.

Prosecutor Catherine Butchard said it was up to the judge to decide exactly "where the cupability lies" but the Crown and defence were far apart in the sentences they were suggesting.

She said the Crown believed it was a case of intentional harm, and Scollay had said she decided to stab her husband as she was walking up the driveway to their house that night.

The defence said it was an act of impulsivity and desperation, and the knife had been used for emphasis rather than lethal intent, but the Crown said that was contrary to her actions.

Defence counsel Rupert Glover said it was a tragic case. It was not a wilful, premeditated act.

He said: "She was very upset when she left the car and walked up the driveway determined that things had to change. She was determined to go to the kitchen and get a knife, to try to drive home to her husband that things had reached snapping point after 20 years of misery and depression."

He appealed for the court to grant mercy.

"If ever there was an occasion when that mercy should be exercised, it is today."

Justice Mander told Scollay that Glover had described her husband as having a "nothing life" in his address to the jury, but the judge said: "His life is as precious as everyone else's."

The couple had both been intravenous drug users and Guy Scollay's health and well-being had deteriorated many years before.

Scollay's distress after the stabbing - she called for help and tried to staunch the bleeding as her husband lay in bed - had been captured in recordings of the emergency calls and her police interview.

She had still loved her husband, and felt she could not leave him.

"This predicament led to the crisis that culminated in the killing of Mr Scollay."

Her admission that she had decided to stab him while she was walking up the driveway led to the inevitable conclusion that she intended to cause him harm.

Ad Feedback

She wanted him to take her seriously, and see the knife and realise how miserable she was.

She told police: "I did it and it was just too easy."

The court heard that the force required would have been no more than an average punch.

She described the stabbing, in which the knife went deep into Guy Scollay's chest, penetrating his heart, as "a moment of madness".

The jduge reduced her sentence because of her remorse, her acceptance of responsibility, and because of her offer to plead guilty to manslaughter - the jury's eventual verdict.

- The Press

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is the mayor correct to put libraries, pools and community facilities ahead of the Town Hall?

Absolutely, they're far more important

I think funds should be split between those facilities and the town hall

No, the Town Hall should be rebuilt first

Just demolish the Town Hall completely instead of rebuilding

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Then and Now