Quake zones not govt policy decision

MARC GREENHILL
Last updated 13:34 30/07/2014
Quake Outcasts
MAARTEN HOLL/FAIRFAX NZ
BATTLE CONTINUES: Bernard Shutt is a member of the Quake Outcasts, which is having its case heard in the Supreme Court.

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Scientists explain 2014 earthquake patterns in New Zealand The year in earthquakes: where it rattled most Red zone ideas submitted Councils can't force seismic strengthening, court says Christchurch quake memorial plans revealed Limited space for Christmas cheer in caravan Dyers Pass Rd reopens Desperate woman in EQC limbo Resilience plan may risk too much talking Teen's quake piece to have abbey debut

The creation of zones classifying earthquake-damaged land in Christchurch was not a government policy decision, a court had heard.

The Quake Outcasts group, made up of vacant and uninsured red-zoned land owners, is having its case heard at a two-day Supreme Court hearing in Wellington.

Among its legal arguments is that zoning decisions were made outside earthquake recovery legislation - authority the Government did not have.

In his opening address on the second day, Crown lawyer David Goddard QC said the power to act was conferred to government ministers by Parliament in June 2011.

The move "reflected the perceived urgency" of decisions needing to be made.

Aftershocks were still taking place at that time, he said.

"The ground was still literally shaking under the feet of the people of Christchurch, and that's what ministers were attempting to respond to."

There was "very significant pressure" on decision-makers to provide residents with information after the June 2011 quake, Goddard said.

The announcement of the red, green and orange zones in June 2011 was an information release, not a policy decision, he said.

"What's very clear is no decision is being made about building in that [red zone] area."

Chief Justice Dame Sian Elias suggested the argument about whether the zoning decision was information or policy was a "man of straw".

"The critical thing is what decisions were taken and with what authority," she said.

Goddard said with or without the zoning, expert advice had deemed the red zone unsuitable for remediation.

Identifying the more than 100,000 green-zoned properties gave landowners and insurers the "comfort" to begin repairs, he said.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content