Potential for 20,000 homes
LIZ MCDONALD
Relevant offers
Christchurch Earthquake 2011
A massive shift of residents and money from earthquake-damaged neighbourhoods will cause unprecedented upheaval in Christchurch.
Real estate agents are warning of shortages of vacant sections driving up prices, while a business leader says about 100 small businesses will be trapped in disappearing suburbs.
The valuation and advisory director of real estate firm Colliers International, Gary Sellars, is warning of a shortfall of vacant sections if thousands of householders take up the Government's offer to buy quake-damaged Christchurch properties.
However, Christchurch Mayor Bob Parker says there will soon be up to 20,000 available sections or properties where people with quake-ruined homes can move to.
Parker said the information he had been provided by council staff was different from Sellars' figures.
"My staff tell me at the present time in the Christchurch market, if you take both the new subdivisions and a number of existing sections tucked into existing communities, that there's probably around 10,000 in that category."
He said the existing sections were "sprinkled throughout the city", and the 10,000 sites were available now.
Parker said 5000 to 6000 subdivision sections had been consented to and would be available in the next few months, and the council would be working hard to open up another 4000 to 6000 subdivision sections in the eastern suburbs.
He believed many of the homeowners who had to abandon their houses would stay in Christchurch.
"I think the majority of people will want to stay in Christchurch, but some will want to leave and that's easy to understand."
Sellars told Radio New Zealand the law of supply and demand suggested that property prices could be pushed up in the region, but Parker doubted that would be the case.
"The market will actually move to deliver outcomes that work for people," he said.
"There's a huge opportunity here and there will be some competition as different elements in the market move to capture that."
WINNERS AND LOSERS
The Government's deal will tip about half a billion dollars and thousands of buyers into the property market - a surge likely to throw off the supply-and-demand balance that governs house and land prices, and rents.
Undamaged homes and new subdivisions are expected to become hot commodities.
Established locations could lose their appeal if services such as shops and schools disappear along with populations, while others may gain an exclusive name or find new riverside parks or recreation facilities on their doorstep.
Traffic and amenities, which traditionally affect value, will shift.
"There are really going to be winners and losers," property valuer Bevan Fleming said. "Some areas could become really special and the changes could be positive, but there are so many question marks."
Fleming said that even if many people left the city, there would still be huge demand.
"If 90 per cent stay in the market, that's a lot of buyers, and how quickly will they get their money? There will be a lot of tenants looking for places, too."
Fleming wondered whether residents choosing to stay in written-off areas would be able to recoup lost value later, and how easily would they get insurance.
He said that as rating valuations were a broad calculation that may not reflect market value, affected property owners must be free to challenge their valuations or seek an independent view.
Real Estate Institute Canterbury director David Rankin said the news would give the real estate market a major boost after "months of lean pickings".
He hoped the payouts would be staggered so as not to create undue pressure and "cause the market to move greatly".
He expected plenty of demand for homes but more for sections as owners of older houses would do better taking the Government's land offer and having their insurer fund rebuilding elsewhere.
People with newer homes might be better taking the full Government payout, he said.
"Some people are going to finish off better than they were," he said.
Rankin said properties in the orange zone, where decisions on land had yet to be made, could lose value if sold before their fate was known.
The average house price in Christchurch's northeastern suburbs, including Avonside, Avondale, Burwood and Parklands, is about $325,000, Real Estate Institute figures show.
Sections are available from about $150,000 in subdivisions in and around Christchurch, and less in towns in the city's commuter belt.
BUSINESSES HARD-HIT
Canterbury Employers' Chamber of Commerce chief executive Peter Townsend said business owners in newly red zoned areas felt "like their hope is gone".
He called on employers to be accommodating and flexible during a tough time for those whose properties had been condemned.
He said there had been a marked shift in workplace dynamics after the June 13 aftershocks, with many more employees suffering stress-related conditions.
CITY BOUNDARIES TO MOVE
Meanwhile, Environment Canterbury (ECan) and local councils have reconsidered a restriction on urban limits to make room for thousands of new Christchurch homes.
Yesterday, ECan confirmed it had asked the Environment Court to approve moving out the boundary set in 2009 to limit new housing development sites.
The shift would clear the way for Prestons, a planned suburb with 2700 sections in Marshland, as well as other areas on the outskirts of Christchurch and surrounding towns.
ECan commissioner Peter Skelton said the councils supported the shift because of the "extraordinary circumstances" after the quakes.
The proposal to alter the limits, set out in the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy, will be heard at a special Environment Court hearing in Queenstown.
Any developments within a new limit would still be subject to scrutiny by the Christchurch, Selwyn and Waimakariri councils.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Folks, to explain section prices, look no further than yer local Clueless City Council.
Ask the developer how much the CCC required, per section, for development contributions, consent fees, processing fees, inspections. And ask the developer how much they had to pay consultants, lawyers, engineers and other professionals, (reduced to a per-section amount) just to jump through CCC hoops. And don't forget to factor in interest on capital, because this is a significant factor: all those fees are up-front, and the longer it takes to sell sections, the higher the 'carry'.
After all, if you had a car serviced, you'd expect an itemised bill, surely.
So demand one as a condition of even thinking about their generous house+land offer.
You'll be in a state best described as 'shock and awe' when you discover the number of zeroes in the CCC-sourced fees, plus their carrying costs.
And lucky you, you get to pay this via a mortgage, so You get to pay interest on the CCC fees, just like the poor developer......
After all, pain is there to be shared, right?
If an earthquake hits whilst settlement is about to happen, purchaser can pull out and get their deposit back, however real estate agents can keep their cut. Ray White did this to me after Septembers big one.. 20k commission on a 30 day listing with all advertising paid by me and through a pre Sept law change they are only morally obliged to pay it back. Guess what.. they didnt. Just in case you are planning on selling take heed.
God defend New Zealand WHEN THE BIG ONE hits Wellington. And it will, sometime in the next 100 years.
the house in China is very very important,and many of 80s are can't pay for it.But pink was a dominant theme at the event, with dresses paired with pink <a href="http://www.voguehighheelshoes.com/" >christian louboutin</a> peep-toe shoes by designer Christian Louboutin . cheap;
Andrew #34 Okay - if you are aware of this - how about you buy privately and develop your own property. Agents and developers (love em or hate em) are doing their jobs - it is up to you to accept or refuse any 'deals' they bring to the table. If you don't like what they have to offer, use your infinite wisdom to do it all yourself.
I have flagged this problem for months. I have 11 acres on the west side constrained by the airport. I have offered my land to subdivide into 2000 sq metre (1/2 acre) sections. They could be developed immediately with individual wells and mini sewage plants. The price for each half acre $170 -270k. However l also offered, 25% which is 5 sections, to the Government for free toward a land swap which is the main problem with the package. I have also promoted compulsory aquisition and swap like with like. Will l get approval to do this on the safest land in christchurch offering totally safe land? No one can tell me remediated, already suspect land of some of the planned subdivions will ever offer certainty. Insurance companies may well determine where subdivisions will go as they are the people who will insure them.
Beware! The sharks are coming! The real estate agents & property developers who drove the property bubble in 2007 are coming out from the woodworks with crocodile tears. There must be stringent checks in place to monitor big real estate agents so that they cannot rip us off (again).
Gov and city council should fast track all sub divisons and abolish consents and all costs Etc involed in sub division if sections are kept below $125000
After yesterday's landmark announcement I just feel gutted. I DO NOT want Key to take over as my insurer and I certainly DO NOT want the taxpayers of NZ to feel they are being shafted. All I would like is a fair shake of the dice. Parker says 20,000 sections are coming on line. Can you get me one at 2007 GV prices? That is all I am being offered. All I would like is to be able to deal with my insurers on the terms under which I have been paying premiums for so long but that seems to have been denied me. 5,099 other people are in the same position. My 530sq m section has a GV of $107,000, other's are in the same position give or take a few dollars. I will need to contribute approx $80,000 to get a comparable section on which to build. In a completely unscientific experiment let's say the average shortfall is $40,000 per home owner. That equals $204,000,000 that we 5100 will be out of pocket. Completely unscientific but using GV which our Council says is only for rating purposes is totally wrong.
Engineer denies 'conflict of interest'
Three charged over pharmacy robberies
Climber dies in Fiordland fall
Blenheim wife killer denied freedom
Man jailed for crossbow, machete incident
Hairdresser who stole cash claims sacking unfair
If in doubt, get a second opinion
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Major courts overhaul proposed
Foreign Affairs Ministry confirms 305 jobs to go
Mob cancels star's performance
Kiwis not up with online security
Helena Bonham Carter 'honoured'
New hope for kiwifruit growers
Gender non-conformity linked to abuse
Nelsen cleared to lead NZ against Jamaica
Robinson starts for Chiefs against old team
Man's childhood comic collection fetches $4.2m
Newest First
Oldest First
Folks, to explain section prices, look no further than yer local Clueless City Council.
Ask the developer how much the CCC required, per section, for development contributions, consent fees, processing fees, inspections. And ask the developer how much they had to pay consultants, lawyers, engineers and other professionals, (reduced to a per-section amount) just to jump through CCC hoops. And don't forget to factor in interest on capital, because this is a significant factor: all those fees are up-front, and the longer it takes to sell sections, the higher the 'carry'.
After all, if you had a car serviced, you'd expect an itemised bill, surely.
So demand one as a condition of even thinking about their generous house+land offer.
You'll be in a state best described as 'shock and awe' when you discover the number of zeroes in the CCC-sourced fees, plus their carrying costs.
And lucky you, you get to pay this via a mortgage, so You get to pay interest on the CCC fees, just like the poor developer......
After all, pain is there to be shared, right?