Church's hasty demo 'absolute sacrilege'

Speed of Trinity deconstruction criticised

CHARLIE GATES
Last updated 05:00 27/09/2011
DANIEL TOBIN

STONEWALLED: Stonemason Mark Whyte is unhappy with the way Trinity Church has been demolished. Here he talks about conserving heritage buildings that have been damaged by the earthquakes.

STONEWALLED: Mark Whyte is unhappy with the way Trinity Church has been demolished.
DANIEL TOBIN/ The Press
STONEWALLED: Mark Whyte is unhappy with the way Trinity Church has been demolished.

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Councils can't force seismic strengthening, court says Christchurch quake memorial plans revealed Limited space for Christmas cheer in caravan Dyers Pass Rd reopens Desperate woman in EQC limbo Resilience plan may risk too much talking Teen's quake piece to have abbey debut 'Jerky' quake rattles Canterbury The art of urban exploration Flashes expose quake-building intruders

The demolition of one of the oldest churches in Canterbury has been branded an "absolute sacrilege" by heritage advocates, but Anglican Bishop Victoria Matthews is defending the deconstruction of the quake-damaged Church of the Holy Trinity.

The Avonside building, designed by Benjamin Mountfort and consecrated in 1857, was badly damaged in the February 22 earthquake and has now been almost completely demolished.

Lyttelton sculptor and stonemason Mark Whyte and heritage advocate Lorraine North, however, say the church should have been slowly deconstructed in order to salvage unique heritage materials.

Whyte said the building, with unique stained-glass windows and hand-painted ceilings, was more important than Christ Church Cathedral.

"It is a pile of smashed up timbers now. It is absolute sacrilege," he said. "It is a very important church and has some very important Mountfort ceilings that have all been smashed in.

"In a perfect world, I would have very slowly dismantled the place and retrieved as much as possible of the heritage fabric, but it is all gone. It is pretty sad.

"The ceilings had collapsed, but it really doesn't help being demolished in this way. It could've been picked over by hand rather than the diggers crunching over them.

"This is indicative of what is happening in Christchurch on every heritage site.

"It's a knee-jerk reaction.

"This is hugely frustrating."

North said the demolition had been "too hasty" and it was "a shame that other options were not explored and there was no public appeal and no attempt to save the church without just going to demolition.

"It is a very great loss."

Bishop Matthews, however, said the church had been a "very, very perilous building".

"It was a beautiful building, but my priority has to be humans and the safety of the community. It wasn't a time to take chances."

Project manager Kevin Long said workers had recovered as much of the heritage fabric as possible. A stone font, pulpit steps and a series of stone carvings were salvaged, as was a time capsule – a glass bottle set in concrete beneath the nave and containing a piece of paper with the words of the church's original consecration.

"We are pretty lucky to have recovered what we are recovering, because a lot of it didn't survive," Long said. "We will carry on recovering as much as we can." Fairfax NZ

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content