$4m cardboard cathedral opposed
CHARLIE GATES
Should public land be used for the Cardboard Cathedral?
Related Links
Relevant offers
Christchurch Earthquake 2011
Christchurch's cardboard Anglican cathedral will get no money or public land if Christchurch City Council staff have their way.
City councillors will decide today whether to support or overrule a staff recommendation on the innovative replacement proposal for the earthquake- damaged Christ Church Cathedral.
The proposal for a temporary cathedral made of cardboard, designed by world-renowned Japanese architect Shigeru Ban, was unveiled in August.
The proposal would cost $4 million, take three months to build and could seat 700 people.
Cathedral dean Peter Beck, who resigned yesterday to seek a city council seat in a by-election, had hoped to find a site and complete the project in time for the first anniversary of the February quake.
The council report for today's meeting rejects the cathedral's preference of building the cardboard replacement in Hagley Park.
"There is strong opposition internally to such a building being placed on Hagley Park for potentially 10 years, not least of all the public perception of the loss of a large area of public space," the report says.
It says a cardboard cathedral in Hagley Park could disrupt sporting fixtures and events like the Ellerslie International Flower Show.
The report rejects helping fund the proposal on private land as it would set a precedent for other groups.
Council staff recommends that cathedral leaders consider church-owned land in the city centre left empty after the quake.
Mayor Bob Parker said the recommendation was the "starting point for a debate".
"When it comes to Hagley Park, the issue is around the length of time they would be looking to have a temporary building in a public space," he said.
"Ten years is a big ask for a piece of public land to be tied up for a decade with one group or organisation."
Beck said the final decision was for councillors.
"It is up to councillors to consider it and we await their response. We have a warm and friendly relationship with council and we hope that will continue," he said.
Diocese communications and media officer Philip Baldwin said he was surprised by the recommendation.
He said he did not think Bishop Victoria Matthews was aware of the recommendation.
Parker backed the cardboard cathedral proposal when it was unveiled in August.
"I don't think it will be too difficult to find a place to put a new temporary cathedral," he said.
Parker was absent at the cathedral's deconsecration ceremony last month.
Councillors appear divided over the staff recommendation.
Cr Yani Johanson said he was shocked by the staff recommendation.
"We need to get things happening and this project would appear to help that," Johanson said.
"I have no qualms about using council land. What is the point of council having land if it is not put to use?"
Cr Aaron Keown said the cardboard cathedral should not be given public support.
"The people of Christchurch don't want money spent on something that would only be there for a year or two," he said.
"They don't want money wasted on temporary things. They want the money put into the real deal coming back."
Wooden spire
A7
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Has anyone considered that the ruined cathedral may be as much a tourist attraction as it was when it was whole? How many of us when visiting older countries head for the ruins of a famous castle or abbey? A long time ago our ancestors were faced with similar problems when wars/fires/diolutions claimed buildings. They were abandoned or replaced elsewhere and the ruins left and viewed as part of history.
Is money being well spent here? This temporary building is costing a seriously large amount of money that would be better spent on permanent structures.
Someone please answer this (maybe a stupid question)
Would a cardboard structure be safe with all the aftershocks etc???
This does beg the question if it shoukd be on Church land then are you telling me its on Church land in the middle of the square? it probably is and in that case the whole square is probably owned by the church too. So i suppose they are then within their rights to just build a cheap tilt slab church right in the middle of our city. i do beleive tourists flock to this church far more than church going people do so would'nt the cardboard cutout be a tourist attraction too. How big is this thing. Is it full size? Kriky that would be either an eyesore or an amazing bit of engineering for us all to go and have a look at!!!
pull your head in chch.
To get a Shigeru Ban building is an amazing asset to any city and is usually only found in big cities around the world, not in little places like Christchurch.
People, especially fellow architects, will come here, just to see the cathedral alone!
If its the church's money, its up to them, it would be like us opposing a cardboard McDonalds and accusing them of using taxpayer money.
Really? Lets go for it, I'd like my town known for more than just earthquakes. Get some vision!!!
This contemptious act of wanting to rebuild the cathedral by the religious zealots is upsetting God and thus the rest of us Cantabs who will have to suffer his revenge. You cannot praise a god who kills your children. So leave the cathedral as a pile of rubble.and your god will be satisfied.
Opinion poll asks if public land should be used or not, but it's a moot question since the thing shouldn't be built at all, at least not with public money.
Putting aside the fact that the structure is a church, it will also be an awesome tourist attraction, this is what the struggling tourism and hospitality industry needs and will attract far more than $4M input into these industries
James??? Where is your brain. As an expat Cantabrian all i have to say is that The last thing christchurch people need is a cathedral. Most would rather see the church donate its money to the poor and help rebuild the homes in the eastern suburbs,. About time this Christian religious superstition was erased from modern society. A monument would be much more preferable even for tourists.
Engineer denies 'conflict of interest'
Three charged over pharmacy robberies
Climber dies in Fiordland fall
Blenheim wife killer denied freedom
Man jailed for crossbow, machete incident
Hairdresser who stole cash claims sacking unfair
If in doubt, get a second opinion
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Major courts overhaul proposed
Foreign Affairs Ministry confirms 305 jobs to go
Mob cancels star's performance
Kiwis not up with online security
Helena Bonham Carter 'honoured'
New hope for kiwifruit growers
Gender non-conformity linked to abuse
Nelsen cleared to lead NZ against Jamaica
Robinson starts for Chiefs against old team
Man's childhood comic collection fetches $4.2m
Engineer denies 'conflict of interest'
If in doubt, get a second opinion
One dead in overnight Oxford blaze
Birthday forgotten in grief over husband
What it means to live in Christchurch
If in doubt, get a second opinion
Earthquake bells proposed as tribute
Police release earthquake audio
What it means to live in Christchurch
Newest First
Oldest First
Religion is dead. The only reason you would build it is for tourism. The church should build it themselves and then charge people to visit it. The state or council should be secular.