Private quake briefing to provide answers
GNS scientist Kelvin Berryman explains the recent spate of aftershocks. The end of the video shows the moment the meeting was interrupted by an aftershock.
Relevant offers
Christchurch Earthquake 2011
Canterbury's aftershock sequence will decay over decades rather than years, says scientist Kelvin Berryman.
The seismologist was speaking at this afternoon's briefing by GNS Science to Christchurch City councillors, MPs and the media on the latest quake science.
The meeting was called after concerns about the frequency and magnitude of aftershocks centred on Pegasus Bay since December 23.
Berryman said the aftershocks would continue for "many decades" but become imperceptible. "It is not a one to five-year period; it is a period of many decades."
He said much of the built-up stress had been released in the Christchurch area, "but around Canterbury there may well be an ongoing sequence over a period of a few decades".
He said remnants of the 1968 Inangahua quake were continuing to this day.
"They are still there, but they are not detectable or stopping people from getting on with their lives,'' he said.
"It decays away to something that is imperceptible.''
The briefing paused briefly as an aftershock rocked the audience, with the experts laughing it off as a magnitude-3.3 to 3.5 shake.
However, it was quickly followed by a long, rolling magnitude-5.0 tremor.
Only half an hour earlier, the audience was told it would "almost certainly" get another magnitude-5.0 quake, as well as "quite a few" 4s and almost daily 3s.
Tsunami warning system within months
Mayor Bob Parker, also speaking at the briefing, said a tsunami warning system was likely to be in place in Christchurch within months, and he hoped by the end of June.
However, the audience was told that a probability of a magnitude-7.0 quake striking Christchurch and triggering a tsunami was "very low".
Berryman said quakes of magnitude 6 did not produce tsunamis of any significance.
But if a quake of magnitude 7.0 hit, "don't wait to be told by Civil Defence to move off the beach".
Berryman said those living in seaside suburbs should "self evacuate".
However, a tsunami was more likely to be triggered by a quake off the coast of South America, and New Zealand would have 12 hours' warning of its arrival.
Berryman said the recent spate of quakes was "very rare".
However, the magnitude-6.0 quake that struck on December 23 was close to that which had been forecast.
GNS Science had forecast a 50-50 probability of a magnitude-5.0 to 5.9 quake striking the region.
"So this was at or a little bit above what we had forecast," he said.
"The probabality of a 7 is low ... It's not zero, but it's very low."
Kaiapoi Fault not reached by recent spate
Berryman said the quakes at a depth of 8km to 10km were in "very old rock" that had broken up into many faults.
The recent spate of quakes centred off the Christchurch coast were reaching towards the relatively large Kaiapoi Fault, "but they're not there yet".
The Kaiapoi Fault may be up to 30km long and potentially capable of producing a magnitude-7.0 quake but the current quakes were not "anywhere near" it.
"Our expectation is [the current sequence of quakes] will go into the same decay sequence as we saw post-February and post-June,'' he said.
"There is amost certainly still a 5.0 out there and we would guess quite a few 4s and 3s on a daily basis.
"We are progressing into a period where quakes are not damaging, but they can affect people mentally.''
Liquefaction risk remains
Berryman said if a magnitude-6.0 quake hit close to the city, liquefaction was likely. "Fives don't really produce significant liquefaction."
Larger quakes further away, such as a magnitude-7.0 atn Hanmer Springs or a magnitude-8.0 on the Alpine Fault may cause liquefaction in Christchurch.
The audience was told that the amount of liquefaction silt spewed out of the ground meant some parts of Christchurch were now "hundreds of millimetres" lower than they were two years ago.
Research seismologist Stephen Bannister said the ground accelerations of the recent quakes were less than the city had suffered early last year.
In the February quake, ground accelerations of more than 2G were felt in many places, including the Heathcote Valley.
"As we move through the June event ... we still got high horizontal acceleration in some areas, and lower acceleration in the city centre,'' said Bannister.
"As we move to the current events in December, we are having much lower acceleration through the city.''
More than 9500 shakes have hit Canterbury since the magnitude-7.1 quake on September 4, 2010.
Cr Helen Broughton asked the scientists if all 9600 shakes were "aftershocks" or if three or four could be classified as earthquakes.
Bannister said the thousands of events could all be be described as "aftershocks" to the September 4 earthquake. This Darfield quake had altered the stress field across the greater Canterbury region .
Mayor Bob Parker said this week that he was keen to provide information on the "unusual" quake sequence.
"People are asking more and more questions around, `What is going on?' '' he said.
"People have said to me that they feel like they're not getting the full story.
"I don't believe that is the case, but I also believe that it's important for our scientists to front up for us to have a chance to get a full briefing as a community."
The briefing was not open to the public.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
@shjonkey #74: "Martin #68 As a geologist surely you are aware that the Greendale seismic event triggered the subsequent quakes? Or are you at odds with the GNS scientists who acknowledge Greendale was the trigger?"
Since Sept 4 2010 there have been numerous cases of quakes on one fault triggering quakes on the same fault or on other nearby faults. However there is no way you can argue that quakes on the Greendale Fault have triggered all subsequent seismic events.
For one seismic event to be considered a trigger for another event the two events have to be close to each other both in terms of location and timing.
Why could this not have been an open public meeting? why is it that only the media get invited? surely the residents of Christchurch should be able to attend and ask questions for themselves. Or are they worried we might start asking the hard questions. We are still not being told everything.
Martin #68 As a geologist surely you are aware that the Greendale seismic event triggered the subsequent quakes? Or are you at odds with the GNS scientists who acknowledge Greendale was the trigger?
@ventur #69: "You will soon be reading about my predictions."
With due respect I think you're either a complete looney or a troll.
@ventur #69: "What do you think causes earthquakes?"
1. Tectonic plate movement results in a build up of elastic strain energy to a point where fracture propagation along a fault plane is initiated. 2. Most fault planes have irregularities along the fault surface that increase frictional resistance. The fault locks up but continued relative motion between the bodies of rock either side of the fault leads to increasing stress and therefore, stored strain energy. 3. Buildup of stored strain energy continues until the stress is sufficient to overcome frictional resistance. 4. The stored energy is released as a combination of seismic waves, frictional heating of the fault surface, and cracking of the rock....more commonly known as an earthquake.
I find this a little odd. If they knew that the number of aftershocks after Sept 4 was lower than expected, then how does My Berryman reconcile that fact with his statement "we could only do the aftershock modelling until recently"? They KNEW that, statistically speaking, more bigger quakes were, and possibly still are, very highly probable. They admitted this in part at the commission, and they did it in an unchallenged way at this meeting.
But that hasn't stopped them telling Telecom, insurance agencies, EQC, the CCC and other large interests these stats in the past. And neither should it. So why have these agencies not let the general public know and allow them to make up their own mind? The CCC, at least, with its poor and near criminal neglect of building monitoring post Sept 4 are not looking good in this. Not that Marryatt or Parker would care.....
Predictions!.Central America pacific regions Accumulating seismic energy( Salvador ,Nicaragua)., South America regions North and south Chile,South and Central PerĂº,South Bolivia,North Argentina regions Accumulating dangerously Seismic Energy enough for earthquakes.
Martin#68 I think we all have to put back all that we know about earthquakes,I understand you,but I'm not with you, even with the scientist from this field,I've been sending messages with predictions for months and all of then with high accuracy. Besides the other messages, this is one of them I sent with this particular date to various Seismologic Centers around the world. All these predictions will change what we know about earthquakes 'til now. You will soon be reading about my predictions. What do you think causes earthquakes?
This one dated at:22:01:12
To info@geonet.org.nz
New Zealand Region will continue with seismic activity for the next few Hours,NZ region in danger!.
@ventur #63: "In the coming hours New Zealand region will be hit by another wave of seismic energy that will increase seismic and Volcano activity in the region."
Seismic energy is sourced from an earthquake...it doesn't cause the earthquake.
Engineer denies 'conflict of interest'
Three charged over pharmacy robberies
Climber dies in Fiordland fall
Blenheim wife killer denied freedom
Man jailed for crossbow, machete incident
Hairdresser who stole cash claims sacking unfair
If in doubt, get a second opinion
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Major courts overhaul proposed
Foreign Affairs Ministry confirms 305 jobs to go
Mob cancels star's performance
Kiwis not up with online security
Helena Bonham Carter 'honoured'
New hope for kiwifruit growers
Gender non-conformity linked to abuse
Nelsen cleared to lead NZ against Jamaica
Robinson starts for Chiefs against old team
Man's childhood comic collection fetches $4.2m
Newest First
Oldest First
Martin #76 Then you are at odds with the GNS scientists who so admire and affirm in particular Jarg Pettinga who wrote in the press on 3/8/11-
'The subsequent larger "aftershocks" are triggered earthquakes following the September 7.1. The September quake imposed stress changes caused by the ground movement in the upper crustal rock formations surrounding the fault rupture, especially projecting eastward from the tip of the fault rupture in September. This in turn created stress concentrations on a number of faults to the east, and closer to the city.
The Port Hills Fault rupture of February 22 will in turn have contributed also to the June event. In summary, the crustal distortions driven by the September event are progressively being accommodated by fault slip on a network of faults extending to the east and southeast of Christchurch.' http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/quake-science/5379813/Ask-an-Expert-where-does-liquefaction-come-from