Christchurch's frack-free status hailed

SAM SACHDEVA
Last updated 05:00 13/04/2012

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Red zone ideas submitted Councils can't force seismic strengthening, court says Christchurch quake memorial plans revealed Limited space for Christmas cheer in caravan Dyers Pass Rd reopens Desperate woman in EQC limbo Resilience plan may risk too much talking Teen's quake piece to have abbey debut 'Jerky' quake rattles Canterbury The art of urban exploration

Christchurch has become New Zealand's first fracking-free city in a move hailed by opponents of the controversial mining practice.

The Christchurch City Council yesterday voted unanimously to declare the city a fracking-free zone.

Fracking – hydraulic fracturing – involves injecting water and chemicals deep into underground rocks to fracture them in an attempt to release oil and natural gas.

It has been banned in some countries after concerns over water and air pollution, and has been linked to small earthquakes.

In New Zealand, Parliamentary Environment Commissioner Jan Wright has launched an investigation in response to growing concerns. The Government has ruled out a moratorium during the investigation.

At yesterday's meeting, the Spreydon-Heathcote Community Board asked the council to declare the city fracking-free because of the concerns.

Board member Paul McMahon said the council needed to take a stance as the Government had declined to intervene. "What we're saying is, stick up for your local people because central government isn't listening."

Cr Barry Corbett said: "I think it's very silly for us, for one, to possibly affect our water with chemicals, and two, to possibly cause seismic issues."

Cr Yani Johanson said the potential risks associated with fracking meant it should be banned.

"I don't think we really get a second chance with the environment if something goes wrong, so it really seems to be that caution is the best approach," he said.

Councillors resolved to discuss the issue with Environment Canterbury (ECan), which is in charge of processing fracking-related consents, and to call on other local authorities to declare their areas fracking-free.

After the meeting, McMahon said the council's decision made it the first citywide authority to take an official stance against fracking.

Mayor Bob Parker said it sent "a very powerful signal" to the rest of the country about the potential dangers of fracking.

"It is a big step forward and a bold statement by the city, and it does reflect a broad level of concern right across the community."

The council wanted to protect its "beautiful" water supply and ensure seismic activity in the city was not aggravated, he said.

He was not aware of any applications for fracking consent within the city boundaries, but companies considering an application would now be aware of the council's opposition.

While ECan was responsible for granting fracking consents, the council would lodge an objection to any applications and consider appealing against any decision to grant a permit.

Ad Feedback

An ECan spokeswoman said the regional council's position was the same as in a briefing paper to ECan commissioners.

The document said ECan did not have any specific rules for fracking but had policies that would apply to fracking activities.

Any consent application would have to state what the fracking proposal involved, the potential environmental effects and how they would be be managed, as well as other criteria.

It was likely any fracking applications would be publicly notified and open for public submissions.

Green Party energy spokesman Gareth Hughes said the city council's decision was a "big boost".

"I think this is really significant. It's a unanimous vote and it sends a clear signal to the Government."

He said the Greens would continue to push for a moratorium on fracking until Wright's report was completed.

Energy Minister Phil Heatley could not be reached for comment, and a spokesman for Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee said he had "no comment to add".

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content