Red-zone residents to take court action

LOIS CAIRNS
Last updated 05:00 12/07/2012

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Quake refugee's career takes off EQC letter cold comfort to flooded resident Aussies offer rebuild help CBD scene compared with 100 years ago Flood-hit families ineligible for claims The Christchurch Town Hall must be saved EQC staffer denies misusing cars Study shows impact of quake stress Historic home halfway to reassembly Cera forks out $672k for 'info' campaigns

Some red-zone residents say they will take court action in a last-ditch attempt to secure the right to stay in their homes.

The Brooklands and Kaiapoi red-zoners believe the Government's buyout violates their civil rights by effectively forcing them off their land.

They had hoped to get the United Nations to intervene on their behalf, but letters they have sent to the UN Human Rights Commission have gone unanswered.

Kaiapoi resident and Wider Earthquake Communities Action Network (WeCan) spokesman Brent Cairns said they had now engaged a lawyer and planned to seek a judicial review through the courts.

''We're going to go down the path of taking the Government to court,'' he said.

''We're just in the process now of putting all the evidence together.''

He said the ''supposedly voluntary buyout offer'' was structured in such a way that it was, in effect, compulsory and bypassed existing laws that regulated the taking of land by a government.

The Government's threats that services would be removed or not repaired in red zones, should property owners choose to stay in their homes, meant that more than 7200 families were effectively being evicted, he said.

Pressure was coming from all quarters, including nsurance companies, for people to quit their properties, but Cairns said he and many others were not prepared to do so without a fight. 

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the Canterbury Provincial Council buildings be restored?

Yes, they are NZ's best example of high Victorian gothic revival architecture.

Only if the cost can be brought down.

No, $70 million could be used for more important things.

Vote Result

Related story: Provincial chambers repair bill $70m

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content