No critical damage to CTV from 2010 quake

MARC GREENHILL
Last updated 11:24 26/07/2012
CTV July 26
STACY SQUIRES/Fairfax NZ

'MINOR' DAMAGE: Brendon Bradley, Ashley Smith and Athol Carr give evidence at a royal commission hearing today.

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Flight bill soars for Canty quake bureaucrats Good news for Redcliffs commuters Kids need reassurance over news reports Quake-prone centre 'unsafe to occupy' Peters claims quake workers weren't paid Quake refugee's career takes off EQC letter cold comfort to flooded resident Aussies offer rebuild help CBD scene compared with 100 years ago Flood-hit families ineligible for claims

Computer analysis of the Canterbury Television building collapse does not support theories that the September 2010 earthquake caused critical damage, an inquiry has heard.

An expert panel convened by the Canterbury earthquakes royal commission today discussed two computer analyses of likely collapse scenarios.

The panel included Canterbury University emeritus professor Athol Carr, Department of Building and Housing report authors Clark Hyland and Ashley Smith, Texas A&M University professor John Mander and Beca technical director Rob Jury.

Jury said that although the second analysis suggested "slighter higher" levels of damage from the quake than first thought, it still appeared to be "relatively minor".

It was "not indicative of a building under distress" or with impaired resistance to shaking, he said.

The damage had little influence on the building's overall performance in the February 2011 quake, and the analyses confirmed the collapse was caused by the failure of one or more columns, Jury said.

Joint failure was not able to be predicted in the computer modelling.

"I still believe that the loss of stiffness is more important, if not equally important, than the loss of strength," Jury said.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the Canterbury Provincial Council buildings be restored?

Yes, they are NZ's best example of high Victorian gothic revival architecture.

Only if the cost can be brought down.

No, $70 million could be used for more important things.

Vote Result

Related story: Provincial chambers repair bill $70m

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content