CBD meeting draws good questions but few people

RACHEL YOUNG
Last updated 05:00 07/08/2012

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Cliff-top properties judged risk to life EQC 'failed' to give top engineer support EQC engineer breaks down at hearing Town Hall rebuild bids sought Sumner residents plea for $10m hub Loving the Christchurch life EQC engineer denies bullying EQC engineer in disciplinary hearing Girl has never known an undamaged home College rejects Reay's money

Fewer than 25 people turned up to the first public meeting on the plan for Christchurch's new central city.

The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority is holding a series of public meetings this week on the Christchurch Central Development Unit's Christchurch Central Recovery Plan.

At the first meeting yesterday, Boffa Miskell director and lead planner Don Miskell and CCDU development manager Greg Wilson talked about the anchor projects, what the new city would like look and the reasoning behind it.

The recurring themes from the crowd included parking spaces, what would happen to certain businesses in the new frame and congratulations to the designers on the blueprint.

John Tavener attended the meeting to understand what work had been done.

The meeting was a "good idea" as it allowed people to ask questions, he said.

Sue Allard questioned Wilson about what would happen to part of the Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology.

"I wanted to hear more detail about the plan and see how it would affect me. It's going to be fine."

Meanwhile, Sue Sutherland turned up with several questions, including whether the central library building could be incorporated into the new blueprint.

She was told it would be a "limiting factor" to keep it there.

Wilson, unconcerned by the low turnout, said those who attended asked knowledgeable questions.

The next meeting will be 6pm tomorrow at Templin Hall, Christchurch Horticultural Centre.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the Canterbury Provincial Council buildings be restored?

Yes, they are NZ's best example of high Victorian gothic revival architecture.

Only if the cost can be brought down.

No, $70 million could be used for more important things.

Vote Result

Related story: Provincial chambers repair bill $70m

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content