Big push on community facilities

LOIS CAIRNS
Last updated 05:00 05/09/2012

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Red-zoners get more time to mull over buyouts Quake zones not govt policy decision Engineer for EQC to face hearing Redcliffs School stays in Sumner for now Quake waste dumping an 'emerging trend' 'Red zone policy never explained' Insurance battle grinds couple down When you disagree with quake repair assessment Broken windows mystery solved Flight bill soars for Canty quake bureaucrats

Pressure is on Christchurch City Council staff to report back on options for repairing or replacing a top-27 list of damaged community facilities by the end of the year.

The council released a draft "top priority" list for the repair of earthquake-damaged community facilities last week and had envisaged reporting back on options for fixing those facilities over an eight-month period.

But at a council community recreation and culture committee meeting yesterday, councillors voted to bring forward the reporting deadline for all the facilities on the list to December.

Cr Tim Carter led the push for the deadline to be brought forward because he was concerned that by staggering the reporting deadlines, the council was giving priority to some of the community facilities on the top-27 list over others.

He said the council should have the same reporting deadline for all the facilities on the list.

"It's about visibility and measurability," Carter said.

Michael Aitken, the general manager charged with overseeing the council's facilities rebuild programme, said the reporting deadlines had been staggered because it was unlikely there would be enough information available on repair options for all the facilities by December.

Council staff could report back earlier, but it would distract them, he said.

Councillors accepted Aitken's note of caution but voted to proceed with the change in deadline.

Committee chairman Cr Yani Johanson said it was important the council "give hope" to the community.

"We have spent a huge amount of time and energy on city-centre projects," he said.

"It is important we are seen not to be focused just on the city centre . . . but we're also working on getting our libraries, service centres and community facilities back up and running."

Ad Feedback

- Canterbury

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the Canterbury Provincial Council buildings be restored?

Yes, they are NZ's best example of high Victorian gothic revival architecture.

Only if the cost can be brought down.

No, $70 million could be used for more important things.

Vote Result

Related story: Provincial chambers repair bill $70m

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content