Demolition starts on Shadbolt House

JOELLE DALLY
Last updated 11:47 09/10/2012
Daniel Tobin

Footage showing the first few hours of the Shadbolt House demolition in Lyttelton.

shadbolt house landscape
STACY SQUIRES
COMING DOWN: Shadbolt House in Lyttelton is demolished today.
shadbolt house std
STACY SQUIRES
GONE: The landmark building was built in 1959.

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Quake zones not govt policy decision Engineer for EQC to face hearing Redcliffs School stays in Sumner for now Quake waste dumping an 'emerging trend' 'Red zone policy never explained' Insurance battle grinds couple down When you disagree with quake repair assessment Broken windows mystery solved Flight bill soars for Canty quake bureaucrats Good news for Redcliffs commuters

Demolition of Lyttelton's old port company building, Shadbolt House, started this morning after it was deemed too badly earthquake-damaged to repair.

The Norwich Quay high rise, owned by Independent Fisheries since the 1990s, has been vacant since it was damaged in the February 2011 quake.

General manager Mark Allison said the company had looked at repairing the building but found the cost of strengthening required to bring it up to the building code uneconomic because of its age.

Demolition is expected to take about a month.

The company plans to build a commercial or retail development on the site, possibly next year.

The landmark building, built in 1959, was home to the company's fleet operation, a customs office, a radio station and two serviced apartments.

A bakery and fish-and-chip shop operating out of portable cabins have relocated to another part of Norwich Quay while the demolition work goes ahead.

The company also owned the Royal Hotel and the Lyttelton Hotel buildings, both on Norwich Quay, which had to be demolished.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the Canterbury Provincial Council buildings be restored?

Yes, they are NZ's best example of high Victorian gothic revival architecture.

Only if the cost can be brought down.

No, $70 million could be used for more important things.

Vote Result

Related story: Provincial chambers repair bill $70m

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content