Land-damage claims won't hold up rebuild

MICHAEL WRIGHT
Last updated 07:56 08/11/2012

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Councils can't force seismic strengthening, court says Christchurch quake memorial plans revealed Limited space for Christmas cheer in caravan Dyers Pass Rd reopens Desperate woman in EQC limbo Resilience plan may risk too much talking Teen's quake piece to have abbey debut 'Jerky' quake rattles Canterbury The art of urban exploration Flashes expose quake-building intruders

Land-damage claims should not delay the rebuild process, the Earthquake Commission and insurers say.

The commission made public this week its programme for assessing and settling the 70,000 claims for land damage from the earthquakes, which it aims to finish by the end of 2014.

One hundred two-person teams will start assessments in January, with most claims being settled within two months of being checked.

Cash settlement is the commission's preference.

Commission spokesman Iain Butler said land claims affecting rebuilds was "ultimately down to the insurers" but should not hold up the process.

"Unless there are specific circumstances that are physically preventing rebuilds, then the fact that you have land damage is . . . not a reason to hold up rebuilds."

Claims would be apportioned, but the process would be much simpler than with property claims, he said.

Area-wide land assessments clearly showed which quake caused which damage, and claims rested entirely with the EQC, he said.

IAG Canterbury recovery executive manager Dean MacGregor said any effect on the rebuild would be "pretty limited", but the commission's schedule was longer than expected.

"We understood that was about an 18-month process. Yesterday [the EQC] confirmed they expect to finish by the end of 2014."

Most land damage cases would not directly affect rebuilds, but homeowners may be asked to hand money over if they did, he said.

"There could be situations where the increased cost of those foundations is directly attributable to land damage and we may ask for the customer to contribute some [settlement] money."

Customers could also pass the management of their land claim to IAG if it was unsettled when work was due to start and let the insurer negotiate with the EQC.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content