Insurers back record of written-off homes

LOIS CAIRNS
Last updated 13:20 02/02/2013

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Most important earthquake book so far? Bars bring vibrancy back to city Supreme Court decision a win for quake claimants Interest sought for Town Hall rebuild Quake fund to help community hall reopen Brownlee backtracks after calling claimants 'grumpy' Daggy sheep plan for red zone roasted Sewerage a pipe dream for man still using a bucket Clothes maketh the property man Earthquake data privacy breach 'avoidable'

The insurance industry is backing calls for a public record to be kept of earthquake-damaged homes that have been written off by insurers.

Property experts have raised concerns that the lack of public records in Christchurch detailing a property's condition could result in unsuspecting house hunters buying quake-damaged homes written off by insurers.

Such properties are beginning to appear on the market and although they are being sold with full disclosure, that may not be the case in future.

Lawyers and real estate agents fear that because there is no public record of insurance companies' decisions to write off some properties, in five or 10 years the properties could be sold to buyers unaware of their true condition.

Insurance Council chief executive Tim Grafton said a public record of properties that had been written off by insurers would also provide an element of protection for insurance companies, which currently could not access other insurance companies' claims records.

"Insurance companies don't want to be insuring houses that have been deemed uninsurable," he said.

Asked why insurance companies could not provide the Christchurch City Council with information about a property's post- quake condition so it could then be included on the land information memorandum held by the council, Insurance Council manager John Lucas said insurers had to comply with privacy legislation.

They could not hand that information over without the permission of the property owner.

"There might be reasons why the homeowner might not want to give that information," Lucas said.

Talks were under way within the insurance industry on setting up an "over-cap claims" database, but it would be accessible only by insurance companies and the Earthquake Commission, he said.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the Canterbury Provincial Council buildings be restored?

Yes, they are NZ's best example of high Victorian gothic revival architecture.

Only if the cost can be brought down.

No, $70 million could be used for more important things.

Vote Result

Related story: Provincial chambers repair bill $70m

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content