Insurers back record of written-off homes

LOIS CAIRNS
Last updated 13:20 02/02/2013

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

'No accountability' for CTV rescue failures Sutton breached confidentiality - Rennie Couple to get working toilet after four years Roger Sutton sex claim 'taken seriously' Thousands stuck in post-quake insurance hell Family weary of chemical loo ordeal Port Hills homeowners to learn insurance fate Graeme Robinson 'negligent and incompetent' CTV engineer punished EQC plan 'unlikely to work'

The insurance industry is backing calls for a public record to be kept of earthquake-damaged homes that have been written off by insurers.

Property experts have raised concerns that the lack of public records in Christchurch detailing a property's condition could result in unsuspecting house hunters buying quake-damaged homes written off by insurers.

Such properties are beginning to appear on the market and although they are being sold with full disclosure, that may not be the case in future.

Lawyers and real estate agents fear that because there is no public record of insurance companies' decisions to write off some properties, in five or 10 years the properties could be sold to buyers unaware of their true condition.

Insurance Council chief executive Tim Grafton said a public record of properties that had been written off by insurers would also provide an element of protection for insurance companies, which currently could not access other insurance companies' claims records.

"Insurance companies don't want to be insuring houses that have been deemed uninsurable," he said.

Asked why insurance companies could not provide the Christchurch City Council with information about a property's post- quake condition so it could then be included on the land information memorandum held by the council, Insurance Council manager John Lucas said insurers had to comply with privacy legislation.

They could not hand that information over without the permission of the property owner.

"There might be reasons why the homeowner might not want to give that information," Lucas said.

Talks were under way within the insurance industry on setting up an "over-cap claims" database, but it would be accessible only by insurance companies and the Earthquake Commission, he said.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Is it worth spending extra to repair heritage buildings?

Yes, Christchurch needs to invest in its heritage buildings

No, we should embrace modern design if it is cheaper and quicker

Only some heritage buildings are worth the money

Vote Result

Related story: Landmark church nearly $1m short

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content