City's poor housing is human rights concern

LOIS CAIRNS
Last updated 05:00 13/02/2014

Relevant offers

Christchurch Earthquake 2011

Red-zoners get more time to mull over buyouts Flood-prone may get cash to lift homes Hazardous waste removed by truckload Quake zones not govt policy decision Engineer for EQC to face hearing Redcliffs School stays in Sumner for now Quake waste dumping an 'emerging trend' 'Red zone policy never explained' Insurance battle grinds couple down When you disagree with quake repair assessment

A concerted effort needs to be made before the winter to identify every vulnerable household in Christchurch, the Human Rights Commission says.

It is worried that three years after the February 2011 quake there are still hundreds of people in Christchurch stuck in inadequate housing. "We have to find out who these vulnerable people are before the next winter and everything we can [do] to make sure they have adequate shelter," David Rutherford, chief commissioner of the Human Rights Commission, told Christchurch City councillors yesterday.

Rutherford attended a meeting of the council's earthquake recovery committee-of-the-whole to brief councillors on the human rights issues that had arisen in Christchurch as a result of the quakes.

He suggested the council should be leading a massive door-knocking exercise to identify those who needed help.

Rutherford said high levels of psycho-social harm in Christchurch were caused by community dislocation, financial distress, unresolved insurance claims and poor or insecure housing.

"This is New Zealand's greatest human rights challenge," he said.

Deputy Mayor Vicki Buck, who chaired the meeting, said the council shared the concerns.

She suggested the Human Rights Commission, the council and the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority meet to work out what needed to be done and who should do it.

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the Canterbury Provincial Council buildings be restored?

Yes, they are NZ's best example of high Victorian gothic revival architecture.

Only if the cost can be brought down.

No, $70 million could be used for more important things.

Vote Result

Related story: Provincial chambers repair bill $70m

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content