Dalziel slams Centennial deal 'lunacy'

GLENN CONWAY
Last updated 17:34 05/12/2013
Centennial Pool
DAVID HALLETT/Fairfax NZ
DAMAGED: Centennial Pool will not be repaired.

Relevant offers

City Centre

Police tower will be imploded Proposal for new church turned down Giraffes spring up around central city Food trucks in Cathedral Square Burst gas pipe leads to evacuations Family feel to new central-city hotel Victoria Square revamp to cost $7m Huge project to put Malthouse back on track Victoria Square revamp startles Stranges building wins supreme award

LATEST:

Plans for a $20 million community playground on the site of the Centennial Pool were ''financial lunacy'' considering it would cost only about $2m to repair the damaged facility.

Centennial Pool supporters today pleaded with Christchurch City Council not to sell that land to the Crown.

But they were told that deal was already done.

Jonathon Gillard and Simone Pearson said it made no sense to spend $20m developing the site into a community playground when $2m was enough to repair the pool.

Pearson said a report suggesting the pool was uneconomic to repair was unsubstantiated and there had never been any probe into a temporary or quick way to bring the pool back.

Dalziel agreed elements of the cost-sharing agreement, especially around Centennial Pool, were not satisfactory but there was not much the council could do because the previous council had signed the deal.

''[The council is] not in a position to take legal action against itself.''

Dalziel said the agreement allowed  the council to decide the future of the Town Hall but that was not the case for any decisions over Centennial Pool.

There is also understood to be quiet frustration among councillors who feel the entire agreement should have waited until the new council took office.

Cost-sharing deal

It was also made clear today that the council must pay its share of the rebuild's cost-sharing deal with the Government even if its earthquake insurance payouts fall short of expectations.

Despite noises from the council this week it may have to revisit that deal, the legally binding agreement, released by the Government, contains a subclause stipulating all council contributions to the anchor projects need to be met by the council ''even if its assumed insurance payouts are less than budgeted for''.

That deal, inked in June, agreed the council would contribute $1.9 billion towards rebuilding damaged horizontal infrastructure and anchor projects.

The council has yet to finalise the insurance payouts on several key facilities, leaving it fearing the payouts could be much less than budgeted.

On Wednesday, council finance commitee chairman Raf Manji admitted it may need to re-think aspects of the agreement or find money from elsewhere if the payouts are less than predicted while the council's acting finance boss, Diane Brandish, described negotiations with insurer Civic Assurance as ''mind-bogglingly slow''.

Ad Feedback

But the June agreement, signed by  prominent leaders including Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee, Finance Minister Bill English, former Christchurch mayor Bob Parker and former city council chief executive Tony Marryatt, makes it clear the council's share must be met, regardless of any insurance-related issues.

- The Press

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

How do you feel about the city's first anchor project, the Avon River Precinct?

Fantastic. It will transform the city

Ambivalent. The city needs more than a river precinct to recover

Not impressed. The design narrows the river

Vote Result

Related story: Vision of city by the water

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content