Eye on Crime: P makes addicts human crimewaves
Relevant offers
Eye on Crime
A recovering Christchurch drug addict with 172 convictions says his up to $2000-a-day P and opiate habit was supported by over 500 burglaries, robberies and dishonesty offences, most of which he has never been caught for.
John, 44, is a living example of the way a drug habit drives other crime and spreads the impact of illicit substances throughout the community.
Now in a residential addiction programme, John said his offending skyrocketed once he began taking expensive methamphetamine, the drug now commonly known as P.
"Mate, I committed a lot of crime. I committed crime I've never been caught for over the years. I'd go out and commit burglaries four, five or six burglaries a night. Every night. Every day. Even while I was at work I'd go away at lunch time and commit a crime to support my habit that night. I was using anywhere up to $2000 daily of all sorts misties (morphine sulfate), whatever. P started coming in and that's where the cost really went up. You're paying $120 for a point (0.1g)."
John said his drug use started at home with parents who smoked cannabis and took pills.
He was drinking by age nine and smoking cannabis by 11.
Intravenous opiate use was his "big turning point" at age 14.
"It put me into a life of crime aggravated robbery, robbery, burglaries, car thefts just a lot of dishonesty crime. I've basically served 22 years of my life behind prison walls because of my drug problem."
The head of the Christchurch Police drug squad, Detective Senior Sergeant Brian Archer, said there was a strong association between drug dependency and crime. "Even if you were a moderate user of cannabis you'd spend $20 to $30 a day and that adds up.
"When you get into the more expensive drugs: methamphetamine costs about $100 for a point that's a very small amount of drugs, about enough for one use that's about $700 a week. So there is a very strong link."
Like the rest of New Zealand, Christchurch's drug scene was mainly cannabis-based, he said.
But, older "hard-core" intravenous users still used morphine and codeine-based drugs.
Some of those had gone over to P but there were still distinct groups of users.
"What I don't see is that P has been the drug of choice for everyone but it still has its own following."
Intravenous users tended to be older the "elder statesmen" of the drug world, Archer said.
Massey University drug researcher Dr Chris Wilkins said Christchurch's "isolation" from the North Island led to a "unique" subculture with a higher proportion of injecting morphine users and a popularity of BZP pills (party pills) and nitrous oxide greater than was found in other centres. P was stronger in the North Island but Christchurch was catching up, he said.
Archer said Christchurch's P scene and the burgeoning numbers of P labs discovered 31 last year compared with 12 in 2006 was still very much based on the Kiwi do-it-yourself attitude.
The skills needed to cook P could be passed on easily and, due to the cost, "people are prepared to give it a crack", he said.
Recovering addict John agreed with Archer that there were "noticeably newer players on the scene".
"I was a user and even I felt sorry for the younger ones," John said.
"Because it's so easy to get addicted."
John has five children, all girls, and two of the older ones, aged 17 and 18, used drugs, he said.
"I definitely don't want them to have the same life as I've had.
"I had a choice to say no.
It's not a sickness it's a personal choice.
"For these younger generations I pray for them not to get into it."
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
The prevelence of Meth in NZ is a product of our poor drug policy. That so many social agencies and politicians grift of the fears created by the continued upholding of blanket prohibitions. Prohibitions that have demonstrated no success in curbing drug use or the unintended consequences. With all this mayhem occuring on their watch and to people who have nothing to do with drug use it is increasngly clear it is prohibition that is the radical policy. This is not a new idea, alcohol, that even Jim Anderton acknowledges as our biggest problem was illserved by making it 'criminal'. Increasingly, as the entire world is having this debate, conservatives are thinking 'control' is better than this endless and expensive failure.
We are living in a policy delusion that delivers inefficient, inequitable, unsustainable, and unjust outcomes. It takes vital resources away from what can be done. The Ottawa Charter says clearly, if one identifies impediments to health promotion "remove them". Only when we have rationalised this can the real work begin.
Decent treatment programs for addicts look like a partial solution here, given how much must be lost from crime it would likely be of less cost to society in the long run.
CTV building's flaws went unnoticed
Motueka log pile play ends in tragedy
Brownlee turns up heat on council over rebuild
10,000 aftershocks and still no end in sight
Four sets of twins take residence
Wrong boot costs adventurer his life
CTV building report 'very thorough'
Child killed at Motueka school
Re-zoning announcement tomorrow
February earthquake toll hits 185
CTV building collapse report 'very thorough piece of work'
Friends playing near log pile before fatal accident
Infratil founder Lloyd Morrison dies of cancer
Pre-pay glitch as Vodafone loses customers
Radio station's divorce promo 'cowardly'
Flushed necklace returned months later
Fonterra taps NZX to run farmer share trading
Briton wanted in 1993 heist nabbed in US
Another horror show for Michael Campbell
Bungled conservation effort kills Sth African rhino
Brownlee turns up heat on council over rebuild
Sir Murray honoured with his own Halberg
Wrong boot costs adventurer his life
10,000 aftershocks and still no end in sight
Brownlee turns up heat on council over rebuild
Re-zoning announcement tomorrow
CTV building's flaws went unnoticed
Five aftershocks jolt Christchurch
Cherished art saved from red zone
Newest First
Oldest First
This article shows we need a complete change in attitude and thinking in this country. All the property crime was to support a drug habit made exceedingly expensive by it's illegality. Drug use and abuse is surely a health issue, and resources would be better spent addressing it as a health issue. By having made drugs illegal we are promoting high levels of property crime, supporting gang incomes and criminalising people who could still be contributing to our communities in a helpful way. One argument supporting prohibition is the level of violence associated with 'P' use - I counter that this too is derived from the illegal nature which amplifies any paranoia a user may have due to all the pressures of maintaining their habit (stealing, lying, cheating, fear of capture, debt, etc). Most other drugs (apart from alcohol) do not even get a mention for violence!
Surely we can all accept a few stoned people around, maybe frowned upon in the same way the alcoholic or speeding driver, if in return we have much reduced prison populations (therefore fewer prisons), reduced crime, reduced insurance premiums and a free-er happier society?
This one person, to feed a habit, committed so much property crime. There must have been so many distressed people left in his wake all because of the high cost of his propensities. Now imagine if he could go to the chemist and procure his wants in a regulated fashion, with health advice and assistance available. No one gets burgled. Paranoia doesn't set in, as the pressue is gone. The cost to society is hugely reduced - all the legal proceedings and incarcerations must cost a heap. Prisons could be reserved for the truly criminal types, freeing resources to maybe turn them around also.
Currently we are heading the way of the USA with our prison populations - and we seem to be mimicking the USA's prohibitions to enlarge prison populations, which, over there, are privately run for profit organisations with powerful lobby groups trying to get laws to increase their business! The social cost of imprisoning a large number of people, who if not for prohibition would be law abiding citizens, just does not seem worth it to me. And it also seems blindingly obvious that the problem is 'prohibition' (which doesn't work!). So we may take a bit of flak from the likes of the USA if we removed prohibition, but we've taken flak from them before and weathered it.
Let's change the thinking on this and turn it into a health issue, not keep it a high cost criminal issue.