Ministry delays release of school info

Last updated 12:04 31/01/2013

Relevant offers


Education a hot election topic Christ's College 'perpetuates drinking culture' Staff 'dissatisfaction' behind school's call for help Linwood College to get statutory manager Popular schools run out of spaces Parents need to take 'foot off the pedal' Trophy raises cricket awareness Modern schools go beyond learning Primary schools go head to head Teachers protest $359m policy

The Ministry of Education warned Christchurch principals about an impending Official Information Act release, before delaying the release at the eleventh hour.

It comes just one month after an investigation by the Ombudsman that found the ministry ''acted wrongly'' in the way it handled OIA requests from schools, government agencies and individuals on the proposals to close or merge Christchurch schools.

On December 10, The Press requested under the act copies of submissions that schools slated to close or merge under a major overhaul had sent to the ministry.

Of the 31 schools that responded to the ministry, 21 had already shared their submissions with The Press.

The OIA request was refused at 3.30pm on January 29 because ''the information requested will soon be made publicly available by the ministry''.

A ministry spokesperson said today: "We were planning on releasing the information earlier. However, we underestimated the amount of work involved. The submissions will be released as soon as possible."

Last night, The Press was forwarded an email from one of the schools slated to close or merge, sent by a regional operations senior adviser from the ministry.

The adviser said: ''This email is to let you know that as a result of an OIA request the material supplied to the ministry as part of schools' response to the closure/merger proposals will be released to the media on 29 January.''

The email added: "Deletions have been made under section 9(2)(a) of the act to protect the privacy of natural persons and under 9(2)(f)(iii) of the act to maintain the constitutional convention protecting the neutrality of officials.

'''We have removed all pictures and names of individuals from the submissions. Also, where there have been petitions or similar, we will just be saying that a petition or survey or whatever, with (number) of responses was included.''

Last month, Ombudsman David McGee investigated complaints from schools, government agencies and individuals about the way the ministry handled requests for information on the proposals to close or merge Christchurch schools.

One of the most common complaints was that official information was refused, at least in part, on the basis that the information concerned would eventually be made public.

McGee found the ministry had ''acted wrongly''.

''Schools and parents should not have to ferret out information by making official information requests.''

Ad Feedback

He found the ministry wrongly advised the Christchurch City Council on how to reply to a request for information and, when the council challenged the advice, failed to acknowledge it was wrong.

The ministry was also wrong to advise two principals to withdraw their official information requests in order to receive a better response.

''Any suggestion that a government agency must bypass the Official Information Act in order to allow a more efficient provision of information is unacceptable,'' he said.

- The Press


Special offers
Opinion poll

Should schools be using dogs to detect drugs?

Yes, it's the best way to get rid of drugs

Only in rare situations

No, they are scary and overly intrusive

Vote Result

Related story: Demand rises for drug dogs at schools

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content