Convenient to blame unions

CHRIS TROTTER
Last updated 08:15 26/10/2010
Chris Trotter
COLUMNIST: Chris Trotter.

Relevant offers

Chris Trotter

Picking a government could get a bit hairy Pick and choose who's right and wrong Dirty politics - is there any other kind? Cunliffe should let the stump do the work Labour in denial on election Cheese on toast vs fiscal blowtorch Using green capitalism to save the planet The Greens are out on their own Protest ain't what it used to be Generation gap behind Kohanga Reo scandal

OPINION: How did a tiny union's attempt to improve the lot of its members end up convulsing the entire nation?

What NZ Actors' Equity tried to do here would scarcely have rated a mention in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland or Australia. Actors, film technicians, specialists of every kind in those countries negotiate with the big film studios all the time.

Only recently, Irish film- makers successfully concluded an industry-wide collective agreement. Ireland, you'll recall, was identified by Sir Peter Jackson's people as one of the places to which location shooting for The Hobbit might be shifted.

Huh?

Why would you shift location filming to a country that already has an industry- wide collective agreement because workers in your own country were attempting to negotiate something very similar for themselves?

It doesn't make sense.

Unless the entire controversy has been manufactured; unless all that we have witnessed since September 28, when Sir Peter Jackson launched a very public broadside against the actors' union, is a cleverly spun fiction. A tale replete with noble hero (Sir Peter) and evil villains (the unions) designed to exculpate its authors from any and all blame for taking The Hobbit offshore.

Can people really do that? Is it really possible for a small group of individuals to sit down and plan a whole series of actions designed to secure a predetermined set of outcomes? How on earth could they be sure that something wouldn't go wrong - that they wouldn't be found out? Wouldn't the certain and catastrophic costs of having such a conspiracy unmasked vastly outweigh the potential benefits of its successful execution?

In most cases that would be the case, but The Hobbit is not "most cases" - far from it.

For a start, the principal player in this drama is an internationally acclaimed movie maestro, a national hero and a knight of the realm. New Zealanders are fiercely protective of such folk, and the news media, more than ever anxious to reflect the preferences of its readers, listeners and viewers, is not about to contradict them by criticising a figure like Sir Peter.

For another thing, the designated villains of this drama - NZ Actors' Equity and the Council of Trade Unions - are tailor-made for the role of "patsy". Less than a month from now, on November 12, trade unionists will commemorate the 98th anniversary of the murder of striker Fred Evans by a gang of scabs and thugs in the little mining town of Waihi. Ever since that bloody day in 1912 the New Zealand trade union movement has been subjected to an unending campaign of vilification and persecution by a combination of extremely powerful economic and political interests. Farmers, business leaders, conservative politicians, Right-wing editors and journalists, and (almost reflexively) a considerable portion of the New Zealand middle-class have never had a good word to say about trade unions. In any stand-off between capital and labour (especially if capital is represented by a national hero) those in the strongest position to influence public opinion can be relied on to blame the unions.

Ad Feedback

This extraordinary anti- union bias was on display as recently as last Sunday when viewers of the Q+A current affairs programme on TV One saw the show's host, Paul Holmes, hector, browbeat, talk over, interrupt and bully CTU president Helen Kelly as she stoically attempted to explain the union's position on The Hobbit.

Small wonder, then, that 87 per cent of respondents to a poll on the Stuff website blamed the unions for The Hobbit's woes.

From this practically unassailable position, Sir Peter and the American studios putting up the money for The Hobbit are well placed to dictate the terms and conditions upon which the production remains in New Zealand. If the Prime Minister and his Cabinet refuse to increase the subsidies on offer to match those available overseas, Sir Peter and Warner Bros can depart these shores with their reputations unsullied - confident that it's the "bloody unions" who will cop all the flak.

If the Government accedes to their demands, not only will Sir Peter be able to bask in the warm approbation of a grateful nation, but so, too, will John Key. New Zealand's reputation as an effectively "non-union" filming location will be restored - along with generous state subsidies.

Also happy will be that permanent combination of anti-union interests. Thanks to The Hobbit controversy, the CTU's "Fairness at Work" campaign lies dead in the water.

I especially enjoyed the irony of Sir Richard Taylor's Weta Workshops-organised "Save The Hobbit" rallies on - of all days - Labour Day.

From beginning to end, it's been a marvellous tale, masterfully told.

Perhaps, one day, Sir Peter will turn it all into an award- winning film.

- The Press

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content