UN investigating drone killings

PETER JAMES SPIELMANN
Last updated 16:53 25/01/2013
KILLING MACHINE: Members of the US Air Force 11th Reconnaissance Squadron perform pre-flight checks on a Predator drone.
Reuters
KILLING MACHINE: Members of the US Air Force 11th Reconnaissance Squadron perform pre-flight checks on a Predator drone.

Relevant offers

World

Ebola toll tops 10,000 High school shooting: 2 dead, shooter's chilling tweets Fears hundreds exposed to Ebola after girl in Mali dies Oscar Pistorius 'pathetic figure', says Reeva's mum Overdoses suspected in Sydney rail deaths Woman who claimed rape put to death Murdered man to be buried in NZ Gun politics to fore after shooting Texas Ebola nurse out of hospital, meets Obama Two police deputies shot dead in California

A UN expert has launched a special investigation into drone warfare and targeted killings, which the United States relies on as a frontline weapon in its global war against al Qaeda.

One of the three countries requesting the investigation was Pakistan, which officially opposes the use of US drones on its territory as an infringement on its sovereignty, but is believed to have tacitly approved some strikes in the past.

Pakistani officials say the drone strikes kill many innocent civilians, which the US has rejected.

The other two countries requesting the investigation were not named, but were identified as two permanent members of the UN Security Council.

That makes it clear the two countries are Russia and China, since the other permanent members are the United States and US allies France and Britain.

The civilian killings and injuries that result from drone strikes on suspected terrorist cells will be part of the focus of the investigation by British lawyer Ben Emmerson, the UN rapporteur on counterterrorism and human rights. 

The UN said Emmerson will present his findings to the UN General Assembly later this year. 

‘‘The exponential rise in the use of drone technology in a variety of military and non-military contexts represents a real challenge to the framework of established international law,’’ Emmerson said in announcing the probe Thursday in London.

Emmerson said countries that use drones have ‘‘an international law obligation to establish effective independent and impartial investigations into any drone attack in which it is plausibly alleged that civilian casualties were sustained.’’

An official with the US mission to the UN, speaking on condition of anonymity, said: ‘‘We are aware of Special Rapporteur Emmerson’s planned report. The United States government has publicly acknowledged that it conducts targeted strikes, sometimes using remotely piloted aircraft, against specific al Qaeda terrorists. As senior officials have said numerous times, including through speeches by deputy national security advisor John Brennan and state legal advisor Harold Koh, these strikes are conducted in full compliance with the law.’’

John Brennan, the anti-terrorism chief who has been nominated as the next CIA director, was the first Obama administration official to publicly acknowledge the highly secretive targeted killing operations, defending the legality of the overseas programme and crediting it with protecting US lives and preventing potential terror attacks. The CIA runs the drone programme.

Ad Feedback

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed lawsuits against the United States over drone attacks that killed three US civilians in Yemen in 2011, including an al Qaeda leader who had been born in the US, cleric Anwar al-Awlaki.

‘‘We welcome this investigation in the hopes that global pressure will bring the US back into line with international law requirements that strictly limit the use of lethal force,’’ said Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project.

Drone strikes have risen under President Barack Obama. According to the Long War Journal, which tracks such attacks, there were 35 strikes in Pakistan during 2008, the last year President George W. Bush was in office. That number grew to 117 in 2010, then fell to 64 in 2011 and 46 last year. 

The programme has killed a number of top militant commanders, including al Qaeda’s then-No. 2, Abu Yahya al-Libi, who died in a drone strike in June.  

The General Assembly could pass a resolution asking for monitoring or restrictions on drones, but it would be non-binding and the United States and other countries that use drones could ignore it. In the Security Council, which can issue legally binding resolutions, the United States has a veto and could block any attempt to restrict drone use. 

A report to the UN Human Rights Council in 2010 by Philip Alston, the independent UN investigator on extrajudicial killings, said that the United States, Israel and Russia were all credibly reported to have used drones to kill alleged terrorists and insurgents. Recently, Iran has also announced it is building drones.

Alston at the time called on countries to lay out rules and safeguards for carrying out the strikes, publish figures on civilian casualties and prove they have attempted to capture or incapacitate suspects without killing them. None of those precautions have been adopted.

Alston, a New York University professor, later wrote in an academic paper published in 2011 saying that the CIA drone programme lacked oversight.

‘‘The CIA’s internal control mechanisms, including its inspector-general, have had no discernible impact; executive control mechanisms have either not been activated at all or have ignored the issue; congressional oversight has given a ‘free pass’ to the CIA in this area; judicial review has been effectively precluded; and external oversight has been reduced to media coverage which is all too often dependent on information leaked by the CIA itself,’’ he wrote.

‘‘As a result, there is no meaningful domestic accountability for a burgeoning programme of international killing.’’

- AP

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content