Pay back security charges, say airlines
BY ROELAND VAN DEN BERGH
Relevant offers
Airlines are demanding that the Government repay up to $36 million in overcharged airport security charges paid by passengers over the last two years.
The overcharge results from more passengers flying than anticipated.
The charges cover passenger and baggage screening at domestic and international airports by the Aviation Security Service for all aircraft with more than 90 seats. International passengers pay a $15 charge as part of their ticket price and domestic passengers are charged $4.66 on their fare.
Airlines want the money to be repaid to passengers over a maximum of two years by lowering the charge. Avsec has over-collected $26.2m in charges over the last two years. That amount is expected to grow to $36m by March next year. In the two years to June 30 passengers paid a total of $155m in security charges.
Avsec can recover only the cost of providing the screening services.
Aviation Industry Association chief executive Irene King says in a submission to an Avsec review obtained by The Dominion Post: "we are gravely concerned over both the amount of surplus and the speed with which it was accumulated".
Avsec began a review of the charge last month which includes a proposal to run down the surplus over the next three to six years. The review discussion document has not been made public.
But Ms King said the money must be repaid over the next year by nearly halving the charge on international fares to $8 and reduced it to $4 on domestic fares. Supporting a longer-term repayment plan would "condone an unlawful tax", she said.
Board of Airline Representatives executive director John Beckett said any reduction in the charge would be immediately passed on to passengers through lower fares. "This should have been corrected about a year ago. If a charge that is intended to recover the cost, does a lot more than recover the cost, that becomes a tax" which must be approved by Parliament, he said.Transport Minister Steven Joyce said the overcharging was the result of Avsec underestimating what it would collect during the recession. "They expected a far greater downturn in air travel ... That is part of where the blowout has come from," Mr Joyce said.
"There would be some questions asked" about Avsec's forecasting model. "It seems to me that they have overshot by a fair margin on this one," Mr Joyce said.
Avsec general manager Mark Everitt would not comment on the repayment proposals, but he said the review was needed "given we were in an over-recovery situation". The review was delayed pending the outcome of a separate Government review of domestic security after an alleged hijacking attempt of a regional Air New Zealand flight in February last year.
Avsec sets the security charge based on forecast of its costs over the next three years.
Ms King said Avsec's forecasting model "has a number of fundamental flaws" which appeared to overstate expected costs.
Avsec projections that its costs would increase by 15.4 per cent this year, followed by increases of up to 8.3 per cent in the subsequent three years "is unacceptably high" at a time of low inflation, Ms King said.
"There seems to be considerable padding in all of the numbers." Most of the increases are due to plans to employ another 71 staff over that time.
Given that international passenger numbers were expected to grow by just 1.11 per cent a year and domestic passengers by less than 2 per cent an increase in staffing was not justified, Ms King said.
Transport Ministry spokeswoman Lesley Reidy said a report and recommendation would go to Mr Joyce in February and new charges would take effect in April.
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
Perhaps the 36m can be donated to the Govt Climate Change fund - haha. Or better yet, trade carbon with it..
I would like me refunds now not in the future, they owe me for 3 overseas trips and I could use that money now not wait until I fly again. The chance of getting a refund - zip.
Tell Avsec I want my nail clippers back too! Honestly, how many terrorists can hold up a plane armed with a pair of nail clippers?
If there has been overcharging I'd like a cheque thanks. I have made a significant amount of flights over the past few years and now intend to stay put. I don't see why I should make further flights simply in order to be recompensed.
Since I don't anticipate flying in the near future, taking advantage of the 'cheaper' fares, how can I go about getting my refund now?
And the Airlines will refund that amount to use the fee-paying passengers? Yeah Right ...
At least AvSec can manage to get enough money to pay their troops.
The Gov't other aviation arm - the Civil Aviation Authority - couldn't manage to sort itself out given a eyar's notice that Jetstar weer coming, locked themselves into a massively expensive new building just as budgets needed to be cut, and then told staff that their bad management and over-spending had nothing at all to do with no pay rise this year!
What a joke.
Made in NZ to win Chinese hearts
Quake city assets set to be popular
EU courts Kiwis for science grants
ERA awards restructured employee $21,000
Government blamed for Psa entry
Zespri deputy won't step aside
Twisted Hop back up and running
I Love Ugly clothing goes online
Christmas contributes to flat December figures
Infratil founder Lloyd Morrison dies of cancer
Court decision looms on suppression
ECan blames algae on low river flows
Decapitated - but not for long
Fatal crash disclosure refused
Good AED supply in town, district
Christmas gift gets mum on the right track
Albury pub manager's dispute escalates
Swim-lesson deal vexes parents
Editorial: Share the limelight?
Are you worried about swine flu?
Newest First
Oldest First
Do I read the story correctly, the airlines want MY money back? As someone who has made plenty of flights to and from NZ in the last 10 years, if I have been ripped off by a government department (and it sure looks like it) then I want a repayment cheque. With all the huffing and puffing and passport recording customs do as you come and go, I would think it would be no trouble whatsoever to figure out who is owed what! I wait with great interest.....speaking of which......!