Editorial: Keeping up with times

Last updated 06:21 27/12/2013

Relevant offers


Editorial: In-depth analysis of incident needed Editorial: Heads should roll over licence renewal gaffe Editorial: Some may protest, but today's a family day Editorial: Midwives bridle at accountability Editorial: One silent, one expansive exit Editorial: Hope and prayer best we can do for rain Editorial: Will Greek leaders decide to default on debt?

OPINION: Worlds have again collided in the Timaru District Court.

In October, a Timaru woman was sentenced to a two-month monitored curfew and 80 hours of community work for breaching a suppression order on Facebook, and this week Judge Joanna Maze saw fit to again issue a warning to Facebook users.

The case this time arose from a family dispute, details of which were subsequently aired online, but on Monday, in sentencing the defendant, Judge Maze suppressed her name and said anyone identifying her on social media risked prosecution.

This is a minefield.

For one, the horse left the stable the moment people started talking online about the case and a subsequent suppression order seems almost posthumous. especially as digging up previous comments is so easy.

And while mainstream media may be aware of the legal risks of identifying people before they have their first appearance in court, the general populace, who have become de facto publishers thanks to social media, have no such knowledge. Or if they do, they choose to ignore it.

And how easy it is to gossip about someone's alleged wrongdoing when no-one is warning you not to. Facebook is a bit like chatting over the back fence. The difference now is anyone can "hear" it.

Which brings us to point two.

Judge Maze issued her warning in court, not on Facebook.

Facebook users certainly may become aware of the warning, but it shouldn't be assumed. It was published in the paper and appeared on The Timaru Herald's website, and links have been made from there, but the courts don't have a Facebook presence.

Maybe it's time they did.

Increasingly this is an issue. You can't have different sets of rules for the different worlds.

So change is needed. Either we do away with suppression (but, actually, it protects victims as well) or the authorities get proactive in warning people about breaching name suppression and make greater examples of those who err.

Which raises point three.

Having issued the warning this week, how will the court know if anyone breaches it?

Ad Feedback

- The Timaru Herald


Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content