DOC to provide comforts for a fee

BY KIRAN CHUG
Last updated 05:00 19/02/2010
Trampers in Abel Tasman National Park
DAVID HALLETT
CARRY YOUR PACK MADAM? Trampers in Abel Tasman National Park, which is already serviced by private tourism operators. DOC plans many more commercial deals with private companies.

Relevant offers

New Zealand

Qantas cuts Auckland-LA route 176,245 fly into Wellington airport An island recovered First Church treasure 36 hours in Wanaka Tourists flock in, but Kiwis flee to Australia Migration figures to turnaround - report Small panel falls off during Jetstar flight Cycling Marlborough's vineyards National mosaic of cycleways

Luxury meals, hot showers and comfortable beds could all be provided by businesses in our national parks under new commercial plans to open them up to more private companies.

The Conservation Department, which had $13.5 million shaved off its budget this year, is also considering charging for services such as the use of toilets and car parks.

Director-general Al Morrison said attracting more businesses to work on the conservation estate was a priority for DOC this year, but did not mean national parks would be turned into theme parks. "This is not about Disneyland or Club Med in national parks."

There were currently 4500 concession holders who paid DOC to run businesses on conservation land, ranging from whale-watching tours to guided walks.

DOC had to cut its expenditure by $54m over the next four years, which Mr Morrison said had led to a "big culture shift".

It needed to work pragmatically and be a more efficient business, while in the past it had been driven by "high principles".

A new "commercial business unit" was being set up, to be headed by a person recruited from the private sector who would implement changes that Mr Morrison said would make some people "nervous".

DOC wanted to work more with businesses, and the unit would identify areas where more commercial activities could occur. "Our aim is that the private sector becomes even more profitable when it's operating on conservation land."

The Environmental and Conservation Organisation's co-chair Cath Wallace said DOC's priority should be conservation. It was a shame funding cuts meant it had to seek money from the private sector. "The Government is trying to starve DOC into submission."

Although Mr Morrison said private businesses would assist with conservation projects, Ms Wallace said such projects were not profitable and private businesses would not do them. "The whole purpose of the conservation estate is for public values and public purposes. That's mostly not consistent with private business and private purposes."

Tour company Ultimate Hikes offers packages for walking the Milford and Routeburn tracks. General manager Noel Saxton said there was a case for more luxury operators in national parks.

At a cost of about $2000, guided Milford walkers had meals provided and stayed in private luxury lodges owned by the company on land leased from DOC, which operated more than 950 huts of its own.

Ad Feedback

Mr Morrison said establishing the new commercial unit was also a response to the possibility of more energy-generation projects on the conservation estate – which covers more than eight million hectares.

The Government is considering opening up protected parts of the conservation estate to mining.

Business New Zealand chief executive Phil O'Reilly said New Zealand needed to consider whether it was getting the best value from its conservation estate or whether it was worth digging up minerals, encouraging private firms to plant carbon sinks, or build hydro schemes.

Setting up a DOC business unit would help with "unlocking the true value" of the estate, he said.

Forest and Bird general manager Mike Britton said DOC's commercial direction was "dangerous and scary". The value of the conservation estate was not commercial.

Mr Morrison said DOC's changes would be consistent with its conservation values, and it made sense to work more with businesses.

"It's now fashionable to be seen as green. If we're not leveraging off that, we are dumb."

Making Money: Ideas To Boost Revenue Selling more concessions to businesses

Charging for public toilets on conservation land

Charging for the use of DOC car parks

Encourage more private businesses to pay DOC for using its land

Allowing energy-creation schemes on DOC land

Visitors To The Conservation Estate Last Year

1.5 million New Zealanders visited conservation areas

700,000 overseas tourists visited a national park

85,000 people walked one of the Great Walks

- © Fairfax NZ News

41 comments
Post a comment
Anne   #41   01:07 pm Feb 23 2010

Under National we won't have any 'national parks' left, we'll have mine sites and theme parks - so much for intergenerational responsibility. When the next generation ask why we sold out, who has the answer?

LC   #40   03:59 pm Feb 21 2010

I've paid taxes since I was 11. So when I want to use DOC land for tramping/camping etc. I refuse to pay.As I see foreigners using the same facilities and not paying as well. First off the tourists need to be taxed for enjoying some of the facilities that MY tax dollars have paid for.Then we can talk about whether NZers need to pay. I have also seen DOC spending money needlessly.For example some new,flash toilets/showers at a camping ground where the current ones are more than sufficient.Wasteful spending in my opinion.In times of hardship I watch where my money is going,why can't they?

Wayne Bicknell   #39   03:49 pm Feb 21 2010

Are there any members of the National and Act parties who own a pair of tramping boots? At least Helen appreciated getting out in our beautiful National Parks.

DC   #38   09:57 pm Feb 20 2010

If a tourist is made to pay $50 to walk Abel Tasman or Heaphy they wont give it a second thought before paying it. That money can be then used to pay for more toilets and rubish removal that is badly needed. If transport of packs and a hot shower is availible then NZers would learn to use this too... there are many NZers that do not tramp as they do not like to be cold, wet and uncomfortable. Personally I just wish DOC would spend a few million $$ getting rid of stinging nettle!

Jean Kenney   #37   10:37 am Feb 20 2010

Surely charging people to go to the toilet will increase waste matter in unwanted areas. How embarrasing! Already the Otago Conservation Board want to ban, and others, shoot, all freedom campers!

Mark   #36   07:46 pm Feb 19 2010

I look back at the people who put aside these areas for conservation with pride. They were the sort of people who put these areas into protection with the hope that they could be enjoyed for their natural beauty without modification for decades to come.

John Key and his fellow politicians want to undo that for the sake of a quick buck. Conservation is conservation land to be protected. No mining, no hot spas, no paths with lanterns on the side leading you up to a bar and meal.

If our conservation land is to be dug up and turned into a theme park (which of course will be), then I'll be first in front of the bulldozers.

no to paying for toilets   #35   01:41 pm Feb 19 2010

Where has the money that DOC is meant to have gone to? .... And now the government is saying tax cuts for the rich. So if I am an average joe and want to go on a tramp and use a toilet, I have to pay for it or dig my own hole. Just so some rich person can have another trip to the Maldives.

Not impressed.

jay   #34   11:22 am Feb 19 2010

O dear, National is going to pimp out our national parks.

AaronC   #33   11:09 am Feb 19 2010

Terrible idea. Charging to use a toilet? What will be the result of that?

Once we open this can of worms it cannot be closed again. While I support businesses that "leave only tracks" I dont support the idea of hotels being built in National Parks. Just more National Party policy scratching the backs of their rich mates.

kirsten   #32   11:08 am Feb 19 2010

This is completely outrageous! Have they gone mad? the current situation where parks are accessible to everyone regardless of income level is something that makes New Zealand a great place to live. To charge for toilets? How about cutting prisoners perks instead. And I go to a national park to ESCAPE commercialism. Hello? You greedy sods. Mining plans? Think of the future generations, not just yourselves. Shame on the government.


Show 1-31 of 41 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content