Fuel-efficient planes could make flights cheaper

Last updated 14:43 17/07/2014

Relevant offers


Plans to clamp down on illegal freedom camping in Marlborough with designated ranger Full steam ahead for Picton to Blenheim train plans How customers who like sleeping in furniture stores sparked retail hotels Surf Air to start all-you-can-fly subscription service in UK Budget Buster: Eight tips for getting cheap rental cars Which Kiwi beach is one of the world's 5 best hidden gems? DoC's $60 park fee idea: Could New Zealand follow South America's example? Low-cost Norwegian Air announces $90 flights from US to Europe Captain Cook commemorations, in Marlborough, to celebrate two cultures Forrest GrapeRide entries down due to quake-hit highway

The north Atlantic is one of the most lucrative and highly competitive airline markets in the world.

Since the late 1940s, numerous airlines have attempted, with varying degrees of success, to operate profitable commercial services on routes between Europe and North America.

A number of carriers have sought, unsuccessfully, to operate these services on a low-cost or "no-frills" basis. The latest to attempt such trans-Atlantic services is Norwegian, which launched routes earlier this month from London Gatwick to New York, Los Angeles and Fort Lauderdale in Florida, USA.

The low-cost model

As most people will be aware, low-cost airlines like Ryanair and easyJet differ from full-service operators by minimising costs and only providing what is necessary for a safe and efficient flight.

This includes flying a single type of aircraft to cut the costs of purchasing, maintenance, training and operations; offering a single economy class cabin; and flying frequent short-haul services, often between cheaper and less congested secondary or regional airports.

Low-cost airlines perform fast turnarounds (often under 25 minutes), carry high passenger loads and maximise the amount of time their aircraft spend in the air. They also focus on generating ancillary revenue by charging for items such as food and drink, hold baggage and priority boarding.

But can the model be extended to long-haul?

Norwegian was established in 1993 and is now the third-largest low-cost operator in Europe (behind Ryanair and easyJet), carrying more than 20 million passengers a year.

In May 2013, after receiving its first long-haul fuel-efficient B787-8 Dreamliner aircraft, it began long-haul services from Oslo to New York and Bangkok. Flights from Copenhagen, Oslo and Stockholm to Fort Lauderdale followed, as did a summer only service between Bergen and New York in May.

Then came London. With one-way fares to Los Angeles, New York and Fort Lauderdale priced from US$341 (NZ$391), US$255 and US$307 respectively, the new routes were heralded for offering increased competition, improving consumer choice and providing more affordable flights across the north Atlantic.

Previous trans-Atlantic ambitions

It is worth recalling those who have been here before. In September 1977 Freddie Laker's Skytrain began flying between Gatwick and New York for US$101 one-way. It was forced to cease operations just five years later due to aggressive pricing by the established airlines.

Ad Feedback

In the late 1970s, Texas-based Braniff sought to operate cheap flights between the US and Gatwick, while in 1983 US low-cost operator PEOPLExpress commenced trans-Atlantic services between New York and London.

In both cases, a lack of revenue management systems combined with rising fuel costs and tactical pricing by the incumbent full-service operators on both sides of the Atlantic meant they too ultimately failed.

More recent attempts by charter operators Zoom and FlyGlobespan were unsuccessful in the 2000s. They both attempted to adopt elements of the low-cost model on trans-Atlantic services but were thwarted by rising fuel costs, competition and softening passenger demand.

So what has changed?

There are a number of factors which could make long-haul low-cost aviation sustainable nowadays. Aircraft such as the B787-8 are more fuel efficient than their predecessors and the Internet significantly reduces distribution costs.

All the same, major hurdles remain. Longer flight times mean aircraft can only perform two flights a day as opposed to six, while crew have to spend nights away from home, which adds significantly to costs.

Greater volumes of hold baggage increase turnaround times and aircraft may need to depart at antisocial hours of the morning since they are operating across multiple time zones, which can complicate scheduling. This may not be possible at airports with strict night-noise curfews.

Added to these are the usual challenges for airline businesses: environmental concerns and volatile oil prices, new security threats and the shifting balance of economic power towards the Middle East, India and China.

While there are many examples of short-haul low-cost operations around the world, there are relatively few long-haul equivalents. The only other example of a trans-Atlantic low-cost service is the daily summer-only Toronto-St John's-Dublin flight that was inaugurated in June by the Canadian carrier WestJet.

Interestingly, Norwegian has in common with WestJet an extensive network of short and medium-haul services that it can use to feed its trans-Atlantic operation.

It also appears to be "trading up" the trans-Atlantic operation from the traditional no-frills approach towards a more conventional charter offer, since its B787-8s are configured with 32 premium economy and 259 standard economy class seats.

Whether this will be enough to enable Norwegian to succeed is too early to say. The long-term success of budget long-haul services will depend not just on attractive prices but on an airline's ability to price discriminate, effectively manage its revenues and yields, and develop and maintain customer loyalty in unpredictable economic and political environments.

If Norwegian overcomes all of the obstacles that have thwarted past attempts, it will be a major milestone in world aviation.

Stephen Ison is a professor of Transport Policy at Loughborough University. Lucy Budd is a senior lecturer in air Transport at Loughborough University

This article was originally published on The Conversation.

Special To The Washington Post


Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content