Relevant offers
Travel Troubles
The "peepshow" scanners that have caused an uproar at airports are finally getting the heave-ho.
It took more than two years of passenger complaints, but the US Transportation Security Administration says it is pulling the plug on the Rapiscan backscatter scanner. The move was made because the manufacturer did not meet a deadline to come up with new software that would create less revealing images. In all, 174 machines at 30 airports will be shut down and moved out.
The machines, introduced in 2010, look like two large metallic bookcases. Travellers are instructed to step between them and put their hands over their head ("Like a cheerleader, give me an O!" is a common joke) and hold still while a scanner takes an image of your body.
Meant to find metallic objects like guns and synthetic items like plastic explosives, the machines were rejected by much of the travelling public because of the explicitly detailed image that they created for TSA officers to see. The security agency wrestled with the backlash, ensuring that the monitor images could only be seen in a secure room and that the images could not be saved or disseminated. Young children were exempted from the machines.
But that didn't satisfy many passengers, who chose to opt out of the machines, which would require a body search by TSA staff - a method that generated its own set of complaints. The machines, meant to speed up security lines, often had the opposite effect. Complaints piled in to the US Congress, which ordered that the machines be fixed or removed by June.
One of two companies, L-3 Communications, was able to come up with new software so that its machines now show a cartoon-like outline of a body. But Rapiscan could not create new software for its backscatter machines and threw in the towel this month. The TSA cancelled its contract with the company.
The 250 Rapiscan machines the TSA owns will not be junked but transferred to other, as yet undetermined, federal agencies. They will be installed for use in security screening where the tradeoff between privacy and security isn't as much of an issue. If you are visiting a military base, prison or other federal facility, you might still have to "give an O" to get through.
- Sydney Morning Herald
Sponsored links
Warning on overuse of hillbilly heroin
Young guns set to debut for the All Blacks
Crown defends 'shonky science' in Lundy case
Sportspeople stand out as most trusted Kiwis
New EPL service offers big savings for fans
Robson: Hansen misses midfield opportunity
Steven Adams hoping for NBA draft night invite
Animosity with Brownlee 'history' - Dalziel
Christchurch construction jobs on the decline
Tis the season for savvy home buyers
Ball-goers keep up with Kardashians
New EPL service offers big savings for fans
Kiwi's first baseball game goes wrong
Big chill brings new flooding risk
Sesame Street creates a Muppet whose dad is in jail
Early-season Man United, Chelsea match-up
Spaghetti-eating driver in fatal crash
Nurse 'lets slip Kimye baby name'
Hairy-leg stockings cause a storm
The most powerful thing you'll see today

Should airline passengers pay what they weigh?