That fantastic, superior breed

JOSHUA DRUMMOND
Last updated 09:09 24/01/2012

Relevant offers

Joshua Drummond

An offer of friendship and advice to the Prime Minister Decency trumps ideology That fantastic, superior breed Surrealist salvation in a Gold Coast mega-church Try a sneaky approach to New Year resolutions Christmas day unwrapped Whatever you know of the world, someone has a conspiracy to match Republican presidential runners abandon secular, scientific belief Explosive rise in dickhead behaviour Suffer the poor voters, for they know not what they do

OPINION:

The thing to remember about chief executives is that they are better than other people – simply the best, better than all the rest, better than anyone or, at least, anyone I've ever met.

Much like a silverback gorilla is larger and more powerful than other males in the troop, chief executives are actually a different breed from the rest of us.

Observe the pale, white skin (from working so, so hard), the piggy, close-set eyes (for scanning vital documents), the craggy forehead (for synergy), the magnificent, Nixonesque jowls (for the intimidation of rivals) and the wet, full, sensuous lips (for arranging business lunches, consuming business lunches, and charming secretaries).

All of the above mean chief executives are able to work much, much harder than the rest of us. Many can endure up to four hours in meetings without any kind of external protection. They can consume up to eight times their bodyweight during a corporate function. Their mighty hands can withstand up to 50 hand-shakings in a week. They can dictate as many as four memos in a given hour.

But their most nebulous and vital skill is "leadership".

What is leadership? Only chief executives know for sure. It is a higher concept, not meant for mere mortals.

Leadership is the Higgs Boson of the business world.

No-one is sure that it actually exists, but without it, chief executives would not be worth anything. Therefore, it must exist.

Indeed, some chief executives' powers of leadership are so prodigious that they can even lead things when away from the office – while, say, on holiday at the Gold Coast.

Chief executives were first bred in the top-secret Nazi Project Ubermensch programme. Adolf Hitler envisaged these elite warriors leading his armies to victory over the rest of the world, but, sadly, the programme came too late to sway the course of World War II.

Only a few were ever launched at Britain, and when Germany fell, United States troops quickly spirited famous chief executive scientist Wernher von Braun and his colleagues away to the US, to work on their own chief executive programme.

This was successful, and the first major chief executive launches took place in the 1950s.

Ad Feedback

Since then, chief executives have brought us a world of unparalleled happiness and prosperity – and this, in addition to their hard, hard work, is why they are paid literally millions of times what (to pick an example at random) a bricklayer is paid.

It used to be that only actual businesses had chief executives, but now that public institutions have become hyperefficient by adopting business practices, nearly every organisation has a chief executive.

City councils have been quick to get on board, realising that only by paying a select few rich white guys much, much more than anyone else will they ever offer ratepayers true value for money. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Hamilton and Christchurch.

In Hamilton, a man called Michael Redman was elected mayor. Some might think this a remarkable pinnacle of achievement, but not Mr Redman. He would moan and toss in the night, grinding his teeth in shame at the raw indignity of his position. He knew he was destined for greater things – the position of chief executive of Hamilton City Council.

So one day, he just kind of resigned and just kind of got the chief executive's job. Later, he just kind of quit the chief executive's job for an even higher-paying one in Auckland.

The enduring lesson here is once you reach a certain level in politics and/or business, you can just kind of do whatever you want.

In Christchurch, a man called Tony Marryatt faces a dilemma. As chief executive of the Christchurch City Council, his job is to rebuild an earthquake-ravaged city single-handedly.

He shuffles paper. He emails. He frequently sits down at a desk for up to 10 hours at a time. He presides over meetings. He answers important phone calls. He takes memos. He takes holidays on the Gold Coast. He works so damned hard that he probably has to eat lunch at his desk. Yet the indolent citizens of Christchurch, do little but repair buildings, shovel liquefaction, bury themselves neck-deep in human waste repairing sewers, and sleep in temporary accommodation because their homes are wrecked.

They are upset that Mr Marryatt is receiving a pay rise of $68,000, bringing his total pay packet to $538,529 a year. What selfishness! Can't they see everything he is doing for them? Can't they see how hard it is? Can't they see how he is inherently better than they are?

It's so unfair.

Chief executives are among the most persecuted beings in our hideously unequal society. My heart bleeds for them.

Joshua Drummond (@josh_drummond)is a Hamilton freelance writer who aspires to become a chief executive.

- © Fairfax NZ News

13 comments
Post a comment
ManMostCynical   #13   10:47 am Feb 14 2012

You have to wonder what's wrong with the world when somebody gets paid $500,000 dollars a year for a desk job.

I think it's quite silly that you can get paid that much for doing something that pretty much anyone with a little bit of charisma and some form of management skills can do.

You basically get paid to sit on your ass and make other people run around for you.

JC   #12   01:23 pm Feb 02 2012

what a rant. Actually a guy paid $100K probably would do as good a job - except he (or she) would know that they are worth more and would look elswhere. Face it - some people earn more than others. Oh, and nice bit of racism creeping in there.... "by paying a select few rich white guys much, much more". Boom.. no repsect for you any more.

BlueShift   #11   04:56 pm Jan 27 2012

Josh, you didn't mention that Mr Maryatt was the CEO of the HCC that Mr Redman took over from.

Quasi-Anonymous Internet Commenter (Not My Real Name)   #10   11:21 am Jan 26 2012

@Si: Ah. I see. So in your estimation, a person's intelligence is directly correlated with how much they earn. I'm going to take a wild guess and assume that you don't earn as much as Mr Marryatt. Let's say you're on $60K P/A - a thoroughly reasonable salary. Congratulations. By your own reckoning, you're about as intelligent as a paramecium.

"Its better to leave people thinking you might be an idiot than tap on your keyboard and remove all doubt."

As did the previous commenter, may I suggest you check your comments for what may be dangerous levels of irony before you send them. As the Good Book says: "You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye." (Matthew 7:5)

Si   #9   08:18 am Jan 26 2012

@#8 so....what do you know? if youre only paid 1 tenth... not a blinkin lot by that admission!

Its better to leave people thinking you might be an idiot than tap on your keyboard and remove all doubt.

chica   #8   12:24 am Jan 26 2012

@ Paul: has the irony of your comment hit you yet? looks like it might take you awhile... Here's a hint: replace the word "article" with "comment" in your reply, and read your comment again. Best of luck following your own advice! :-)

@ G: Yeah, I agree. If anything proved the dude was an idiot, it was his complete failure to comprehend why people were annoyed at him for taking the bonus. If he's that bad at understanding issues, how the heck is he any good at his job?! But hey, I'm only paid a tenth of what he is, so what do I know?

Paul   #7   09:22 pm Jan 25 2012

Ah yes, the stink of jealousy. Someone is earning more money than you. So climb onto you dirty little keyboard and bash out a sarcastic, bitter article for a two-bit local rag. Well done. Get a life.

Greg   #6   via mobile 05:06 pm Jan 25 2012

Nicely written. I agree with your sarcasm level at these so called chiefs. Like someone paid 100,000 wouldn't do just as good a job as these 'experts'

G   #5   10:48 pm Jan 24 2012

Hahaha, nice one. I've never understood the value of council CEOs. They must contribute something, but I don't see how any of them warrant half a million dollars of ratepayer money in a town struggling after natural disasters. I would think accepting the bonus proves he's a idiot, as he can't even see why people are unhappy about it.

wharekura   #4   03:00 pm Jan 24 2012

entertainment from josh @ long last compared to some of his sewage of late


Show 1-3 of 13 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content