Modern man a wimp says anthropologist
Reuters
Relevant offers
Many prehistoric Australian aboriginals could have outrun world 100 and 200 metres record holder Usain Bolt in modern conditions.
Some Tutsi men in Rwanda exceeded the current world high jump record of 2.45 metres during initiation ceremonies in which they had to jump at least their own height to progress to manhood.
Any Neanderthal woman could have beaten former bodybuilder and current California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in an arm wrestle.
These and other eye-catching claims are detailed in a book by Australian anthropologist Peter McAllister entitled Manthropology and provocatively sub-titled The Science of the Inadequate Modern Male.
McAllister sets out his stall in the opening sentence of the prologue.
"If you're reading this then you - or the male you have bought it for - are the worst man in history.
"No ifs, no buts - the worst man, period ... As a class we are in fact the sorriest cohort of masculine Homo sapiens to ever walk the planet."
Delving into a wide range of source material McAllister finds evidence he believes proves that modern man is inferior to his predecessors in, among other fields, the basic Olympic athletics disciplines of running and jumping.
His conclusions about the speed of Australian aboriginals 20,000 years ago are based on a set of footprints, preserved in a fossilised claypan lake bed, of six men chasing prey.
FLEET-FOOTED ABORIGINALS
An analysis of the footsteps of one of the men, dubbed T8, shows he reached speeds of 37kph on a soft, muddy lake edge. Bolt, by comparison, reached a top speed of 42kph during his then world 100 metres record of 9.69 seconds at last year's Beijing Olympics.
In an interview in the English university town of Cambridge where he was temporarily resident, McAllister said that, with modern training, spiked shoes and rubberised tracks, aboriginal hunters might have reached speeds of 45kph.
"We can assume they are running close to their maximum if they are chasing an animal," he said.
"But if they can do that speed of 37kph on very soft ground I suspect there is a strong chance they would have outdone Usain Bolt if they had all the advantages that he does.
"We can tell that T8 is accelerating toward the end of his tracks."
McAllister said it was probable that any number of T8's contemporaries could have run as fast.
"We have to remember too how incredibly rare these fossilisations are," he said. "What are the odds that you would get the fastest runner in Australia at that particular time in that particular place in such a way that was going to be preserved?"
Turning to the high jump, McAllister said photographs taken by a German anthropologist showed young men jumping heights of up to 2.52 metres in the early years of last century.
STARK DECLINE
"It was an initiation ritual, everybody had to do it. They had to be able to jump their own height to progress to manhood," he said.
"It was something they did all the time and they lived very active lives from a very early age. They developed very phenomenal abilities in jumping. They were jumping from boyhood onwards to prove themselves."
McAllister said a Neanderthal woman had 10 percent more muscle bulk than modern European man. Trained to capacity she would have reached 90 percent of Schwarzenegger's bulk at his peak in the 1970s.
"But because of the quirk of her physiology, with a much shorter lower arm, she would slam him to the table without a problem," he said.
Manthropology abounds with other examples:
* Roman legions completed more than one-and-a-half marathons a day carrying more than half their body weight in equipment.
* Athens employed 30,000 rowers who could all exceed the achievements of modern oarsmen.
* Australian aboriginals threw a hardwood spear 110 metres or more (the current world javelin record is 98.48).
McAllister said it was difficult to equate the ancient spear with the modern javelin but added: "Given other evidence of Aboriginal man's superb athleticism you'd have to wonder whether they couldn't have taken out every modern javelin event they entered."
Why the decline?
"We are so inactive these days and have been since the industrial revolution really kicked into gear," McAllister replied. "These people were much more robust than we were.
"We don't see that because we convert to what things were like about 30 years ago. There's been such a stark improvement in times, technique has improved out of sight, times and heights have all improved vastly since then but if you go back further it's a different story.
"At the start of the industrial revolution there are statistics about how much harder people worked then.
"The human body is very plastic and it responds to stress. We have lost 40 percent of the shafts of our long bones because we have much less of a muscular load placed upon them these days.
"We are simply not exposed to the same loads or challenges that people were in the ancient past and even in the recent past so our bodies haven't developed. Even the level of training that we do, our elite athletes, doesn't come close to replicating that.
"We wouldn't want to go back to the brutality of those days but there are some things we would do well to profit from."
Sponsored links
Random #83. Some 'Random' thoughts indeed! To clarify things for you, mountain ranges such as the Himalayas and Andes are composed mainly of granite. These mountains only protrude approx 8km above the earths surface. However the crust below is about 90km thick, much thicker than the approx 10km thick, predominantly basaltic crust under most of the large oceans. The theory only now beginning to become widely accepted from recent studies is the Fracture Propogation Theory, which has displaced the outdated plate tectonics theory. Studies show that magma from within the mantlic and asthenospheric regions has in all likelihood forced its way up through the fault line in the earth's crust at these mountainous regions, with the enormous pressures within the mantle under the 100km thick land masses at these points, creating the vertical lift up to 8km in height. Geo #84 The fact is that continental masses in the mountainous regions you're talking about are up to 100km thick, of high silicon oxide granite. Oceanic basaltic formations are up to 10km thick, with basalt being a fraction of the yield stress of basalt, due to the weakened crystalline structure from far more weakly bound compounds, and is more typical of hardened scoria. What's going to break or move first in your theory? JF #90 There are a limited number of rock types. Magma forced up from similar depths and pressures etc will have similar surface characteristics. Compare identical basaltic rock formations from places in Chile, Turkey, Colorado, Ireland etc,etc none of which line up to give the outdated plate tectonics theory any credibility
@ aussie scientist #89
Wikipedia, of course! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians#Terminology
Comparing Homo Sapiens to Neanderthals is a bit like comparing apples with oranges. Anyone with any knowledge of our evolutionary history knows that Homo spaiens didn't evolve from Neanderthals; they co-existed and shared a common ancestor. Needless to say, there are 6,000,000,000 homo sapiens alive today and 0 neanderthals. You can draw the same comparrison between homo sapiens and a gorilla, or a chimpanzee; both of which we would be out-muscled by.
@ James #80
"However these plates do not move significantly sideways"
We had this argument in the 60's, until a New Zealand Geologist, Harold Wellman, showed that faults can definitely move side-ways.
Have you looked at a geological map of New Zealand recently? Possibly the world's best example of "side-ways" or horizontal movement on a fault lies right here in NZ! Rocks on the western side of the Alpine Fault near Nelson (e.g. the red rocks of Dun Mountain) are identical in every way to those on the eastern side of the Alpine fault in NW Otago (e.g. those in Cascade River). These rocks were once continuous and have since been separated "side-ways" from each other by "side-ways" movement on the Alpine fault.
Faults can also cause parts of the crust to move away from each other. The crust is stretching in some places, like East Africa, where it will eventually separate and form a new ocean. Don't take my word for it check out:
http://geology.com/articles/east-africa-rift.shtml
Or, am I being too complicated for a lesser-educated academic?
I'm not sure where you get your information from, Fraser, but here in Australia no-one minds referring to aboriginals as aboriginals, including themselves.
#70 JCofChch,
Your comment is reasonable,in a sporting context. However I was referring to a particular historical incident. Ancient rowers rowed for survival as they were the "engine" of Greek warships,that's definitely more incentive than a medal or two. The rowers were recruited from the poorer citizens(not slaves) of the city-state,I doubt if even historians know much about their training methods.
@ #29 Evolution is considered fact, the theory of evolution is how evolution works.
Call me a wimp... so what!
@ Tom 68
Thanks I was hoping someone would actually respond!
But its not the issue im targeting, your hypothesis claims that our large brains are an adaptation to survive declining physical abilities. But what would cause this decline? The prevailing hypothesis in this book and thread is that we dont need to be strong or fit anymore, and my earlier post argued that lack of pressure doesnt force a decline, it just fails to produce an improvement, "evolutionary stasis" as Dawkins calls it.
We still have incredible latent genetic potential for physical fitness. An adult can more than double their strength over a few years of strength training, people can train to run ultramarathons in thier senior years. We still have these genes, but we need to train to switch them on - they havent been devolved out. I would agree that if you took the average modern man and placed him in Ancient Rome he would be relatively weak, at least for a while. But if you took a child and did the same thing - I submit they would be just fine.
Doctors treat mystery patient in Haiti
Mother guilty of murdering 'bipolar' child
Sri Lanka parliament dissolved
Avalanches kill at least 28 in Afghanistan
'Violent' man who took hostages at Clinton office flees
UN slams Haitian hospitals for charging patients
Canada may expand air commander murder probe
Defiant Iran accelerates nuclear programme
'Lovesick' student sparked airport alert
UK student's terrorism conviction quashed
Dubai tower shut after visitors stuck in elevator
Billboard used in hunt for taxi driver's killer
Harawira Maori seats bill 'a mistake'
Base jumper injured in 30m fall
SPCA steps in on injured dog standoff
Crayfish game closed down in Auckland
Palin's ex stars as nude coverboy
Referee says rugby has to change
Operation Titstorm hackers strike Australia
'Lovesick' student sparked airport alert
Paranormal Activity too scary for Italians
SPCA steps in on injured dog standoff
Daily trivia quiz: February 10
'Very white' Australian rugby cops criticism
Principal accused of sunburn bribe
Eva Longoria in porn Tweet mishap
SPCA steps in on injured dog standoff
Key confirms GST increase being considered
A pass for Key, but much more to do
King Kong ship meets watery grave
Sanzar and Sky decide it's time to titillate the fans
Newest First
Oldest First
"... Are you serious? There is no way vertical plate shift could create mountain ranges like the Himalayas without Volcanic activity. Are you trying to say the plates bend at the edges without fracturing and releasing magma?"
This is possible. The Indo-Australian plate moves into the Eurasian plate at a rate of approximately 2-3 cm per year. When two continental plates collide in this way, no magma from the mantle is released, therefore there is no volcanic activity. Instead, a crumple-type effect happens, which creates mountain ranges, in this case the Himalayas.