Defence: Pistorius 'one of worst' witnesses

CHRISTOPHER TORCHIA AND GERALD IMRAY
Last updated 07:11 08/08/2014
Reuters

With closing arguments underway in the Oscar Pistorius murder trial, South African state prosecutor Gerrie Nel asks the judge to reject Pistorius's defence as "devoid of any truth".

Oscar Pistorius
HORRIFIC ENDING: Reeva Steenkamp and Oscar Pistorius.
Oscar Pistorius
Reuters
ON TRIAL: Oscar Pistorius arrives at the courtroom at North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria during the murder trial for the killing of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp.

Relevant offers

Africa

Documenting with dignity in the Ebola zone Researchers try to quell Ebola fears Nigerians doubtful of girls' release after 'truce' breached Hitman dies before testifying Ebola could be 'humanitarian disaster of generation': Oxfam Boko Haram attacks ahead of release of Nigerian schoolgirls WHO faulted for Ebola as Obama taps czar Boko Haram cease-fire, girls to be released Pistorius 'not cold-blooded killer' 'Witches' hacked to death in Tanzania

In closing arguments in a murder trial that has riveted South Africa and many around the world, the chief prosecutor has said that Olympian Oscar Pistorius dropped "the baton of truth" and produced a succession of lies to save himself from a conviction for shooting to death his girlfriend.

Likening the sensational trial to the sport that made the double-amputee runner world-famous, Gerrie Nel said Pistorius had lost this race and urged the judge to convict him of premeditated murder for killing Reeva Steenkamp.

The charge carries a sentence of at least 25 years and up to life in prison.

Nel said Pistorius' explanation that he acted out of fear there was a dangerous intruder hiding in a toilet cubicle in his bathroom was "absolutely devoid of any truth."

Nel criticised Pistorius in the Pretoria courtroom, saying he was an "appalling witness" ready to lie at every chance to cover up a murder.

The chief prosecutor spoke for nearly five hours, using the 109-page written argument the prosecution submitted to the court last week.

Chief defence lawyer Barry Roux listened and checked files as Nel spoke.

Judge Thokozile Masipa occasionally questioned Nel, and urged him at one point to speed up. At the start of closing arguments, she had warned the lawyers they had only until the end of Friday to complete them in court.

"Unless, of course, you want to work on a Saturday and perhaps Sunday, after church," she said, smiling.

The defence repeated its claim that police had tampered with crucial evidence at the scene, but Roux had only started his final arguments when Judge Masipa postponed proceedings until Friday for the defence to finish.

That day is scheduled to be the 41st and final day of proceedings before Masipa adjourns to consider a verdict with her two legal assessors, five months after the trial opened. South Africa has no trial by jury and there are no limits on how long Masipa may take to reach her judgment.

Pistorius could also be convicted of a lesser murder charge or negligent killing, both of which call for years in jail. The judge could acquit him if she believes he only made a tragic error.

Nel argued that Masipa should still convict Pistorius of murder, even if she accepts his story that he didn't know it was Steenkamp behind the door.

Either way, Pistorius armed himself with his 9mm pistol on February 14, 2013 and shot four times with the intention to kill someone and with no reason to believe his life was in danger, Nel said.

Pistorius sat behind Nel, occasionally looking through documents and appearing calm, in contrast to some past occasions during which he retched and wailed in apparent distress.

For the first time in the trial, Pistorius' father, Henke, and Steenkamp's father Barry were in the courtroom, sitting at opposite ends of a long bench in the gallery.

Ad Feedback

Pistorius denies murder and claimed he thought Steenkamp was an intruder about to come out of the cubicle and attack him when he shot, hitting the model in the head, arm and hip.

Nel said that Pistorius' lawyers were now claiming two defences and he criticised them for floating more than one theory about what happened shortly after 3am on the night.

Defence lawyers had argued that Pistorius fired intentionally in self-defence, Nel said, but they also say he was not criminally responsible and accidentally fired because he was "startled" by a noise.

"It's two defences that you can never reconcile," Nel said.

Throughout his argument, the prosecutor dismissed Pistorius' entire story as a "mosaic" of lies that he had to keep adding to keep the picture "intact."

Nel said Pistorius' contention that minutes before the shooting he was bringing in fans from a balcony and therefore did not see Steenkamp getting out of bed was one of many lies.

The fans photographed at the scene were not where Pistorius said they were and Nel concluded Pistorius had to make that part up to explain why he didn't know it was Steenkamp in the bathroom.

"He had to put himself in the bedroom ... He had to create time for the deceased to get to the toilet," Nel said.

Ending his closing argument, Nel said Pistorius was guilty of premeditated murder because in the midst of an argument, he "made up his mind" to find his gun, walk through to the bathroom and shoot.

"That, my lady, is pre-planning," Nel said to the judge.

Defense lawyer Roux spoke for around 30 minutes, addressing the police force's handling of the scene and explaining why the fans and other objects in the bedroom were not where Pistorius said they were at the time of the shooting.

"We're not talking about a conspiracy," Roux said, calling it unintentional tampering.

- AP

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content