African land lost to biofuel
Relevant offers
Africa
Biofuel demand is driving a new ``land grab'' in Africa, with at least 5 million hectares acquired by foreign firms to grow crops in 11 countries, according to a study by an environmental group.
The contracts by European and Asian companies for land to grow sugar cane, jatropha and palm oil to be turned into fuel will involve clearing forests and vegetation, taking land that could be used for food and creating conflicts with local communities, Friends of the Earth said in the study.
Proponents of biofuels argue they are renewable and can help fight climate change because the growing plants ingest as much carbon dioxide from the air as the fuels made from them emit when burned.
Critics say there is a risk of the crops infringing on land that could be used for growing food and that destruction of rainforests to make way for palm oil and sugar outweighs any carbon benefits gained from the use of such fuels.
``The expansion of biofuels ... is transforming forests and natural vegetation into fuel crops, taking away food-growing farmland from communities, and creating conflicts with local people over land ownership,'' Mariann Bassey, a Friends of the Earth Nigeria activist, said in a statement.
The report said Kenya and Angola each had received proposals for the use of 500,000 hectares for biofuels and there was a similar plan to use 400,000 hectares in Benin for palm oil.
Rice farmers had been forced off their land for a sugar cane project in Tanzania, it added.
``The competition for land and the competition for staple food crops such as cassava and sweet sorghum for agrofuels is likely to push up food and land prices,'' the study said.
Other studies have suggested biofuel expansion would not be harmful and could even be beneficial for African agriculture.
Last month, researchers from Britain's Imperial College, carbon trader CAMCO, and the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA) said biofuels would boost investment in land and infrastructure.
They said this could have a positive effect on food production, and if properly managed would not mean destroying natural forests.
- Reuters
Sponsored links
Uzbek pleads guilty to Obama kill plot
Gaddafi's son warns of uprising
Obama tries to defuse birth control fight
Fraudster's $59m shopping spree brings 15 years jail
Two Tibetans killed by Chinese security - report
New Zealanders caught in Maldives coup
US Marines posed with Nazi symbol
Drifting family in dramatic Pacific Ocean rescue
13.6 tons of pure methamphetamine seized
Cameras capture girl's abduction ordeal
Prison officers 'turned into mules'
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Rugby joy short-lived, nation pessimistic
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
Roll on 2050 - New Zealand economy to rise
England fight back to edge Italy in Six Nations
Suarez a 'disgrace to Liverpool' in loss to United
Police arrest five at Murdoch's Sun newspaper
Oceania, Fifa roles end in disgrace as facts emerge
Cameron-Barrett to headline Heavyweight Explosion
Gardener's paradise planned for Chch
Danny Lee drops back to pack at Pebble Beach
Obama tries to defuse birth control fight
Ethnic rights advice stuns communities
Roll on 2050 - New Zealand economy to rise
Dotcom accused van der Kolk 'flabbergasted'
Prison officers 'turned into mules'
Tension high as lethal log pile cleared
Rugby joy short-lived, nation pessimistic
Police name Hawke's Bay crash victim
Vatuvei magic gives Warriors win over Souths
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
Old trains more reliable than new Matangi
Bus changes raise fears in suburbs
Deep south beats rest of nation in jobless
Farmer faces wait over 'useless' land
Governor General's concert draws thousands