Authorities launch website over Ohio rape

JULIE CARR SMYTH
Last updated 07:39 06/01/2013

Relevant offers

Americas

Prison worker in New York inmates escape pleads guilty U.S. Navy investigates report of cancer cluster at Guantanamo Tragedy of 'golden' daughter's fall resonates with Asian immigrant children Mystery lion sightings captivate Milwaukee residents Obama says yet to hear good argument against Iran nuclear deal Snake selfie ends with $230,000 bill Teen boys missing off the coast of Florida Donald trumps CNN poll of 2016 Republicans, says he leads 'movement' Obama knocks Huckabee, Trump for slide in Republican rhetoric Boy Scouts set to vote on allowing gay leaders

 

Authorities investigating rape accusations against two high school football players in eastern Ohio launched a website today intended to sort fact from fiction after hacker activists spurred interest in the case.

The site sponsored by Steubenville city and police officials has the appearance of a legal briefing, with black type on a white background, providing an intentional departure from escalating emotions over the case and how it's been handled.

"This site is not designed to be a forum for how the Juvenile Court ought to rule in this matter," the site declares.

Two 16-year-old boys are set for trial February 13 in juvenile court in Steubenville on charges that they raped a 16-year-old girl in August. Their attorneys have denied the charges in court.

The website provides a timeline of the case, summaries of Ohio laws that affect sex charges, online posts and reaction to them, facts about the local police force and a pledge of transparency.

Public interest in the case increased this week with circulation online of an unverified video, more than 12 minutes long, that purportedly shows another young man joking about the accuser. The video apparently was released by hackers who allege more people were involved and should be held accountable.

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine has called the posting "despicable" but said it didn't constitute new evidence for local investigators, who were aware of it before the posting.

As investigation continues, it has spurred heated commentary online. Some support the defendants and question the character of the teenage girl, while others allege a cover-up or contend more people should be charged.

The latter group includes hacker-activists associating under the Anonymous and KnightSec labels who point to comments they say were posted around the time of the alleged attack on social media by people who are not charged.

A second peaceful protest in as many weeks was planned for today at the local courthouse.

Ad Feedback

- AP

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content