Opinion: Trump should offer Romney Secretary of State role, and Romney should take it stuff nation

AFP

Donald Trump meets vocal critic Mitt Romney to sound him out as a candidate for Secretary of State.

OPINION: US President-elect Donald Trump is said to be considering one of his most vocal internal critics, Mitt Romney, as Secretary of State.

Howls of outrage, left and right, predictably ensued since the the GOP's 2012 nominee – a mainstream Republican from Central Casting – berated Trump mercilessly in the lead-up to the recent election. He couldn't even bring himself to vote for him.

And yet, at this turbulent moment, as Trump installs one far-right figure after another to his cabinet, accusations of hypocrisy against Trump and Romney – fair game in the normal course of events – should be set aside.

Mitt Romney's credentials for the role are bolstered by his prescience on Russia.
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

Mitt Romney's credentials for the role are bolstered by his prescience on Russia.

Trump would be wise to offer the Secretary of State post; Romney should accept it; and the Senate should rush to confirm him before the wildly erratic President-in-waiting changes his mind. Here's why. 

READ MORE:
* Trump considering Mitt Romney for secretary of state: NBC News
* TPP nations eye a future without the US with Trump as President
* Donald Trump wasn't even there, but he was all the talk at APEC
* Donald Trump defends decision to settle Trump University lawsuits

 


While no doubt Mitt Romney retains his view, expressed as recently as August, that Trump is a "con man" and "fake" who threatens to bring "trickle-down racism, trickle-down bigotry, trickle-down misogyny" to America, the stakes are too high to allow politics as usual to get in the way of what would be a profoundly reassuring appointment.

If Mitt Romney is offered and agrees to serve as Secretary of State, it will not be to implement Trump's reckless and ...
Mike Segar/Reuters

If Mitt Romney is offered and agrees to serve as Secretary of State, it will not be to implement Trump's reckless and often incoherent foreign policy agenda, but to act as a vital bulwark against it.

Romney at the State Department would go quite some way to quelling fears among US allies, in particular NATO, that the Trump presidency is set to redraw the geopolitical map in terrifying and unpredictable ways.

On Romney's part, it would be an act of patriotism to take over the State Department. After all, it seems unlikely the multimillionaire former Massachusetts Governor pines for a seat in Trump's cabinet, populated, as it is so far, by alt-right identities whom he despises no less ferociously than Obama. The appointment of the radical Islamophobe, General Mike Flynn, as Trump's National Security Advisor must send chills down his spine.

Romney's credentials for the role are bolstered no end by his prescience on Russia.

In a 2012, during one of the presidential debates, Mitt Romney's cited Vladimir Putin as America's greatest global security threat, deemed a gaffe by most pundits at the time. He was derided for ignoring a rampaging Isis and Iran's burgeoning nuclear programme. But events in the four years since – not least the annexation of Crimea, incursions into the Ukraine, and Putin's catastrophic alliance with Bashar al-Assad in Syria – have vindicated Romney.

Ad Feedback

On critical questions as to how a Trump White House deals with Syria, along with the imperialist ambitions of Putin, particularly towards the Baltic states, Romney will not abide the kind of US-Russia alliance at which Trump has repeatedly hinted. Nor will he mimic his president's fawning admiration of Putin's uber-machismo.

Overall, Romney's foreign policy views align far more closely to the current president than his soon-to-be successor.

Like Obama, he is neither a neo-conservative hellbent on remaking the world in America's image, nor an isolationist determined to surrender the country's global leadership. He is, again like Obama, a free trade proponent – he supports the TPPA, for example – and, while he may not be able to stop Trump's rush to neo-protectionism, he would be well placed at the State Department to slow it down and mitigate its worst effects. And, unlike Trump, Romney vehemently opposes torture, an unlamented legacy of the previous Republican President.

Perhaps above all, temperamentally, Romney's patrician demeanour – an irritating feature of his presidential bids – is well suited to diplomacy under a President who could not be less so.

Alt-right conservatives who despise the GOP establishment – the lunatics now in charge of the asylum – will undoubtedly baulk at Romney's appointment.

But Trump's knack for distracting them with meaningless but symbolic culture war stunts like yesterday's Twitter tirade against the musical Hamilton will limit the fallout.

The payoff in terms of ameliorating concerns on both sides of the aisle about his foreign policy intentions will more than offset outrage from Trump's "basket of deplorables". And, while Trump's approval ratings are the lowest of any newly elected president, there is no better time to disappoint one's base than during a transition honeymoon.

Democrats should resist the lure of point-scoring and welcome a prospective Romney appointment.

If he is offered and agrees to serve as Secretary of State, it will not be to implement Trump's reckless and often incoherent foreign policy agenda, but to act as a vital bulwark against it.

And for that reason alone, we should welcome the appointment with open arms.

 - Stuff Nation

Comments

Ad Feedback
special offers
Ad Feedback