US fears as N Korea fires missiles
Related Links
Relevant offers
Asia
North Korea has fired more short-range missiles off its east coast - a possible prelude to the launch of a long-range missile towards Hawaii over the US July Fourth holiday.
Firing a ballistic missile on Independence Day would be a challenge to Washington, which has been rallying international support for enforcement of UN sanctions imposed against Pyongyang following a May 25 nuclear test.
North Korea is banned from testing ballistic missiles under UN resolutions.
Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura said Thursday that a long-range missile launch this weekend was possible. "We cannot rule out the possibility," he said, citing Pyongyang's past behaviour.
In 2006, North Korea launched its most advanced Taepodong 2 missile while the US celebrated Independence Day, though the rocket fizzled shortly after takeoff and fell into the ocean.
Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the United States remains concerned about North Korea's missile and nuclear programs but called Thursday's launches "not unexpected."
Several US Defence Department officials said there is nothing to indicate that North Korea is ready to launch a long-range ballistic missile and there appears to be no immediate threat to the United States.
The April 5 launch of a Taepodong-2 required 12 days of preparation on the launch pad, which was fully observable to US satellites. Short and medium-range missiles, however, can be launched with little notice.
Missile defences around Hawaii were beefed up following a mid-June report in a Japanese newspaper that the North might fire a long-range missile toward the islands in early July.
The head of the US Northern Command, Gen Victor E "Gene" Renuart, said in an interview with the Washington Times this week that US missile defences are prepared to knock down any incoming North Korean missile.
"I think we ought to assume there might be one on the Fourth of July," he said, according to the paper.
ATOMIC BLAST
North Korea raised concern in late April when it explicitly threatened to test-fire an intercontinental ballistic missile and warned of a nuclear test.
The regime followed through with the atomic blast in May, leaving the ICBM test as its next likely step.
"I totally expect that we will see another long-range missile launch ... because they said they will do it," said Ralph Cossa, president of the Pacific Forum CSIS think tank.
The North's April launch, which is estimated to have sent a rocket about 3,200km, represented a "significant advance" in the country's long-range rocket technology, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists said in a recent report.
South Korea believes the Taepodong 2 can travel at least 6,700km, putting Alaska and Guam within striking distance.
The North is also believed to be developing an advanced version of the Taepodong 2 that could reach not only Hawaii, but also the West Coast of the US, with a potential range of about 8,000km.
Pyongyang had earlier marked a large area of water off its east coast as a no-sail zone until July 10, citing military drills.
Thursday's launches of four short-range missiles were believed to be the North's first military action in the designated zone.
Yonhap news agency, citing an unnamed military official, reported that all four missiles flew about 100km and identified them as KN-01 missiles with a range of up to 160km.
INTERNATIONAL CONCERN
Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso denounced the launches as "provocative."
South Korea's foreign minister, Yu Myung-hwan, said the firings are "not a good sign because they are demonstrating their military power."
South Korean analysts were skeptical about the possibility of a long-range launch anytime soon.
Koh Yu-hwan, a professor at Seoul's Dongguk University, said he expects the North will take more time to assess international reaction to its recent pledge to expand its nuclear program.
Tensions over North Korea's actions come as its leader Kim Jong Il has reportedly been laying the groundwork to hand power over to one of his sons, and as two American journalists were imprisoned for illegal border crossing and hostile acts.
Analysts predict the North will continue its provocative acts in an attempt to command world attention that can lead to economic benefits.
"I think what North Korea will continue to do is ratchet up the tension," said Brad Glosserman, another analyst at the CSIS think tank.
"It needs that attention to get the concessions from other countries ... as well as to demonstrate its strength to domestic constituencies."
President Barack Obama has vowed the US won't make the same mistake of rewarding North Korea's bad behaviour, and his administration has been pressing China - a key North Korean ally - to enforce the new UN sanctions against Pyongyang.
Obama said he was trying to "keep a door open" for North Korea to return to international nuclear disarmament talks, but the country must abandon its nuclear weapons programs before it can join the world community.
Philip Goldberg, in charge of coordinating the implementation of sanctions against the North, told reporters in Beijing that he had "very good conversations" with Chinese officials Thursday, though did not give details of the talks.
- AP
Sponsored links
"Miltary might!", do you have any idea what you're talking about...
I'm from South Korea, and without those "Yanks" acting as an obstacle for North Korea, in South Korea, the Korean region would be a totally different place, perhaps a warzone (with the South winning this time, of course).
Get Beijing to take more responsibility of its "own region"??? First of all, it's not their region; is NZ Australia's region? Secondly, China's already tried doing that, by supporting the North Korean army during the Korean War. -which led to everyone else in the world getting involved.
What obviously needs to be done is for North Korea to become a deomcracy and follow South Korea's footsteps. Otherwise, for them and South Korea to become fully separate; end ties - this is what I prefer. This will end the hostility between the two countries, as all this is based on the hostile relationship between South Korea (and hence the US) and North Korea. This won't be easy as the North has got too dependent on our previous unconditional aid.
Well what do people expect! Sanctions are not the solution. They just create more anger and hatred. Hurting the common civilian on the street.
If people really want to resolve this, then get rid of the United Nations which is basically a bullshit small group of dictators founded after WWII called the Security Council. Turn the U.N into an International Justice Court. Then regionalise the world into 5 federal and independent divisions. Re Korea, get Beijing to take more responsibility for its own region. This means get the the Yanks out of Korea/Asia. If I had my country divided back in the 60's because of international interference (especially the Yanks) I would be pissed off too. Additionally Yanks out of Europe, Yanks out of the Africa/Middle East and then countries like North Korea won't feel so threatened. Then with all the money saved presently been wasted by the USA in Iraq, Korea etc more development on miltary technology...
get them first
what do you expect i think they will launch but when there expecting it the least just hope its not a live warhead
Get over yours North Korea
NZ woman's death in Paris explained
Briton wanted in 1993 heist nabbed in US
13.6 tons of pure methamphetamine seized
Bungled conservation effort kills Sth African rhino
Cameras capture girl's abduction ordeal
Cruise ship disaster captain knew 'it was over'
Indians sue beer companies sued for alcohol problems
Drifting family in dramatic Pacific Ocean rescue
Shock at River Cottage barn blaze
Argentina slams British 'militarisation'
West offers words, only, as Syria killing rages
213 Christchurch properties red zoned
Pike River body showed no sign of explosive force
Infratil founder Lloyd Morrison dies of cancer
Cameras capture girl's abduction ordeal
Friends playing near log pile before fatal accident
Shoppers spend more on credit, debit cards
Flushed necklace returned months later
Fonterra taps NZX to run farmer share trading
Briton wanted in 1993 heist nabbed in US
Another horror show for Michael Campbell
Bungled conservation effort kills Sth African rhino
Brownlee turns up heat on council over rebuild
Wrong boot costs adventurer his life
Radio station's divorce promo 'cowardly'
NZ woman's death in Paris explained
Infratil founder Lloyd Morrison dies of cancer
All Blacks stars of the show at Halberg Awards
Daily trivia quiz: February 10
ACC beneficiary admits he cheated
Radio station's divorce promo 'cowardly'
All Blacks stars of the show at Halberg Awards
Helmet law halves cyclist numbers
50c an hour increase triggers outrage
Invest in You, Part 12: Swimming
Newest First
Oldest First
Dan
It does not matter if Korea would be a totally different place without the Yanks. Every country has the right to establish its own destiny. To exist with it own politics and its own internal civil wars without interference from others outside of itself.
If the South and North have an issue, then it is up to you lot to sort it out. Winners and losers or compromise as brothers. BUT it is never right for other countries to interfere. I repeat every region/nation has the absolute right to establish its own destiny without interference of other agendas.
Korea is Beijing's region. Korea is just a little slice of the pie hanging off China. The region is called Asia. And it certainly it NOT America nor Russia.
Cannot you see the strategy here! It is simply the Yanks wanting a foot hold in Asia, close to China.. If you are from South Korea, you should be ashamed that you willingly let an foreign and non-Asian super power interfere with your own destiny. What type of society cannot accept victory nor defeat by ones own strength and allow the future to progress naturally under the superior man.
What type of society when weak cries for aid from those whom have no business to give it - this interferring with the natural order of things, and the natural developement of nations.
The world is full of winners and losers, and Korea needs to sort its own shit out without the interference of Western foreign powers. Why should we in Oceania or even those persons in America have to die for a country that that cannot sort out its own destiny and accept what is is to become with honour.
No, democracy is not the solution, good government is the solution. Democracy more open to abuse than other system, and the more I experience it and the lies and falsehoods behind its façade the more I dislike it. Multi-party democracy is a terrible system designed to weaken and divide a country for selfish interests that is all.
Governance comes from control and force. And good governance comes from Unity. What is best for ones country comes from those who are strong enough to take destiny into their own hands. Korea can have no soul by being a Yankee puppet country.