Eyes on independents

GEORGE WILLIAMS
Last updated 23:27 26/06/2013

Relevant offers

Australia

Police not trigger happy - commissioner Mother 'allowed to name' baby dumped down drain Newborn baby dumped in Sydney drain survived for six days Newborn found down drain in Sydney Third shark sighting clears Bondi Beach Kiwi killed, stashed in chilly bin in Australia Witness shielded from family in court Australian baby monitors and webcams hacked Women should aspire to lead despite sexism - Gillard Man charged with killing Kiwi pleads not guilty

OPINION: The Australian Labor Party is entitled to choose its own leader. But unless the party also has a majority of members in the House of Representatives, there is no guarantee that its leader will be the Prime Minister. In the case of this hung parliament, that decision is also one for the crossbench members of the House.

As outgoing Prime Minister, Julia Gillard is expected to advise Governor-General Quentin Bryce as to her successor. However, the decision of who to appoint is ultimately one for the Governor-General. By convention, she must commission as Prime Minister the person who commands the confidence of the House of Representatives.

Gillard was able to demonstrate this by entering into written agreements with a number of crossbenchers. In return for policy commitments, they promised to support a Gillard government in votes of confidence and on matters of supply.

As has been said on many occasions by members such as Tony Windsor, these agreements only bind the crossbenchers to support Gillard. They do not guarantee support in the event of a leadership change.

The question is what will happen now Kevin Rudd has deposed Gillard as leader of the ALP. All eyes should be on the Independents. If a sufficient number to produce a parliamentary majority support Rudd, or at least are not prepared to support a no-confidence motion against him, his position as Prime Minister is secure.

On the other hand, if they shift their allegiance to Tony Abbott, as Windsor has suggested he might do, then Rudd will not command a majority, and he might not be signed in as Prime Minister, or his tenure might be short lived. This though could depend upon whether the opposition is willing to move a no confidence against Rudd. Abbott might prefer to push for an earlier election than to bring Rudd down.

A final scenario is that Independent members are prepared to vote against Rudd, but are not prepared to support Abbott. In this situation, parliament could be unworkable, and an immediate election may be appropriate. This might bring the election forward from September 14 to as early as August 3, which is the first possible date for a simultaneous election of the House of Representatives and half of the Senate.

None of these scenarios is a constitutional crisis. The conventions of our Constitution are sufficiently clear to produce an outcome. It is not the conventions themselves that are uncertain, but the positions of the Independents.

It is to them that the Governor-General will look when she exercises judgement as to who commands the confidence of the House of Representatives. Just as they were kingmakers at the beginning of this parliamentary term, so too the Independents will play this role at its end.

Ad Feedback

George Williams is the Anthony Mason Professor of law at the University of New South Wales.

- Sydney Morning Herald

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content